INSIDE STORY: How Labour tried to gag The National with £30k legal threat ahead of General Election
LABOUR have been condemned after attempting to stop The National from publishing a story using a legal threat.
The National was planning to publish an article last week about a senior Labour figure being reported to Police Scotland for alleged breaches of electoral law.
But Labour soon sent a threatening legal letter arguing that publishing it would be defamatory and in breach of electoral law - a “corrupt practice” and potentially a “criminal offence”, one that could result in jail for the journalists responsible.
Police Scotland dismissed the complaint a week later whilst The National deliberated over whether to risk tens of thousands of pounds in legal costs by publishing.
Legal threats like the one The National received from Labour come amid increasing concern about SLAPPs, which stands for “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation”.
READ MORE: Labour deny reports they want to regain UK access to key EU body
The complicated acronym hides a simple tactic. A rich oligarch or shadowy corporation, for example, wanting to suppress a story, will threaten costly legal action unless the journalist or media outlet in question agrees not to publish what it knows.
While such legal action may be all but guaranteed to fail, achieving a victory would be a long, expensive process that most media simply cannot afford. And most often, these powerful agents have deeper pockets than the news outlets.
"SLAPPs are a pernicious attack on freedom of speech and democracy,” Roger Mullin told The Sunday National.
“No political party should be using SLAPPs to silence journalistic comment at any time, let alone during an election.”
The former SNP MP has long advocated for Scotland to tighten the law on SLAPPS. A petition he submitted to the Scottish Parliament was approved earlier this year, with Community Safety Minister Siobhian Brown (above) announcing the Scottish Government will consult on the issue in autumn this year.
Labour’s legal threat to The National came the same week The Independent reported that the party attempted to gag a prominent Black barrister who wrote a report about racism within the party.
The newspaper reported that a letter sent by lawyers representing Labour warned Martin Forde KC that he was “acting against the party’s interest” after he gave an interview with Al Jazeera in March 2023 saying there was a lack of debate and engagement by the party over his findings at the time.
In response, it has now emerged that the Labour Party sent Forde a robust legal letter – seen by The Independent – which accused him of acting against the party’s interests and advising him that it was “considering all of its options”.
It also comes as Labour’s manifesto for the 2024 election lacked no media-specific policies, despite senior figures including shadow Foreign Secretary David Lammy previously committing to taking action against SLAPPs – mentioning in particular threats from Russian oligarchs.
Mullin added: “Despite what David Lammy says, SLAPPs are not the sole preserve of Russian oligarchs, and no political party, Labour included, should be using the law as a weapon against legitimate journalism."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel