A GROUP of pro-Palestinian protesters gathered outside Wimbledon with a giant tennis ball and strawberries “tainted with Palestinian blood” to demonstrate against Barclays’ sponsorship of the event.
The protest, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, saw about 100 protesters stand outside the main entrance to the south-west London tennis club on Monday – the first day of the Grand Slam contest.
Protesters set up a giant tennis ball with the words “Barclays sponsors Wimbledon and genocide” written on it, along with plates of strawberries covered in red sauce.
On the strawberries were the words: “Wimbledon strawberries tainted with Palestinian blood, courtesy of Barclays”.
Queuing fans looked on as protesters chanted “stop bombing schools, and stop bombing hospitals”.
READ MORE: Wounded Palestinians tell of IDF 'throwing us onto jeep bonnet'
A speaker played the Italian song Bella Ciao as attendees held a sign that read “Stop The Genocide”.
Lewis Backon, 28, from London, a spokesperson for the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, said Barclays was financing companies supplying weapons to Israel.
“The official partner of Wimbledon is Barclays Bank, and Barclays is financing, to the tune of billions of pounds, companies supplying weapons and military technology that Israel is using in its genocidal assault on Palestinians in Gaza,” he said.
“You can’t use tennis as a shield to improve your reputation and to hide from accountability for your role in financing Israel’s genocide and apartheid against Palestinians,” he added.
“I think Wimbledon should end their sponsorship with Barclays.
READ MORE: How Labour tried to gag The National with pre-election legal threat
“They shouldn’t allow Barclays to use tennis to hide from accountability as a shield to improve their reputation when they’re so complicit in Israel’s devastating attacks.”
He added that “many fans share our anger”.
“So we hope, before going in, a lot of Wimbledon fans will be here joining us engaging with us and also demanding that their sport, tennis, shouldn’t be used like this to provide cover for a bank which is financing genocide,” he said.
Meanwhile, more than 300 commercial billboard, tube and bus shelter adverts near tennis club showed artworks targeting the bank over its alleged ties to defence companies as well as high-emitting firms.
The adverts included images such as a bomb crater in a tennis court and tennis whites stained with oil and blood alongside slogans like “Partners in climate crimes and genocide” and “From Gaza to global warming, we’re making a killing”.
Kit Speedwell, from the Brandalism campaign which is behind the adverts, said: “Wimbledon’s cherished strawberries and cream image has been thoroughly sullied by its decision to partner with Barclays, the most toxic bank in Europe, while the bank continues to pour millions into the arms trade and fossil fuel companies driving climate chaos.
“Wimbledon must stop providing cover for Barclays’ grotesque lack of morals and immediately end the sponsorship deal.”
Tony Burdon, CEO of Make My Money Matter, said: “Barclays is the new Shell, and is using Wimbledon’s great reputation to cover up its role in financing the climate crisis.
“No decent organisation should be sponsored by Barclays, and if Wimbledon is serious about its legacy, and its commitment to the environment, then it must drop them.”
The All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) is the latest organisation to come under fire from climate and pro-Palestine protesters over its sponsorship deal with Barclays.
Barclays suspended its sponsorship of Live Nation festivals last month, after bands pulled out of events as part of a pro-Palestine boycott.
Last year, film stars and celebrities, including Dame Emma Thompson, also called on Wimbledon to end the sponsorship deal with Barclays.
A spokesperson for the AELTC recently called Barclays an “important partner”, as they outlined their ambition to have a “positive impact on the environment” as a marker of a successful championship.
Barclays has previously addressed the criticism in a statement online, saying it provided financial services to nine defence companies supplying Israel but does not directly invest in such firms.
The bank said it has become the target of a disinformation campaign over its ties to defence companies which has put colleagues at risk.
In response to the protests, a spokesperson said: “We are proud of our partnership with Wimbledon which supports the growth of the championships and opportunities for young people across the UK through the Wimbledon Foundation.
“Like many other banks, we provide financial services to companies supplying defence products to the UK, Nato and its allies.
“We are also financing an energy sector in transition, including providing one trillion dollars of Sustainable and Transition Finance by 2030 to build a cleaner and more secure energy system.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel