VOTERS are heading to the polls today to cast their ballot in the General Election and the results will all be decided via a First Past The Post (FPTP) voting system.
On the face of it it’s quite a simple system where the winner takes all.
The UK is divided into 650 constituencies (57 in Scotland). The candidate with the most votes in each constituency will become its MP.
There will be one candidate per political party on your ballot paper, with usually some independent candidates too. Voters only receive one vote and so simply put a cross next to the person they wish to become their MP.
It is a simple majority voting system and so a winning candidate only needs one more vote than any of the others to be elected.
It sounds easy, but the system it marred with controversy and you will probably hear a lot of talk about wasted votes around the election.
What’s the problem with it?
The issue with FPTP is it’s not proportional, so all the votes that were cast for other candidates other than the winner end up meaning nothing.
So you could have a situation where the winning candidate gets 42% of the vote. They got more votes than everyone else, but they also got fewer votes than all the other candidates combined.
Quite often, this means the winning candidate isn’t actually who most of the electorate backed.
READ MORE: Will the SNP’s Pete Wishart win seventh term as MP?
Equally, the party which ends up forming the government may not actually have received the most votes. They have just simply ended up with the most MPs.
This is why you see some people calling for electoral reform and a fairer system, so that the Parliament can be more representative of the nation.
What is a proportional representation (PR)?
Some more proportional systems are already in use in the UK. The Scottish Parliament (below) uses the additional member system where voters get to cast two ballots – one for a constituency MSP and another for what’s known a list or regional MSP.
The constituency vote uses FPTP, where you choose an individual candidate you want to represent you at Holyrood. Meanwhile, for the list vote, voters simply choose a party rather than a specific candidate and regional MSPs are then chosen using a formula, meaning the number of seats a party gets in total across the region is about the same as the percentage of votes it receives.
Council elections in Scotland also use a proportional system known as single transferrable vote, which is designed to reflect diversity of opinions in an area.
In this case, voters rank candidates in order of preference. For someone to be elected, they will need to hit a certain quota or set number of votes.
READ MORE: New General Election poll puts SNP ahead of Labour
Votes are counted in stages, with only first preference votes being counted in the first stage. Anyone who reaches the quota at this stage is elected.
At stage 2, any votes received for a candidate above the quota are transferred to the next choice on each of those ballot papers. If no candidate has enough votes to reach the quota, the one with the lowest number is eliminated. All of their votes are then passed to the next preference on those ballot papers.
This process is simply repeated until all the seats in a council ward have been filled.
So you can see how both of these systems allow people to express their opinions in a more nuanced fashion and receive a parliament that ends up representing the breadth of feeling across a community.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel