THERE can be few constituencies that have so visibly suffered an attack of buyer’s remorse as Stirling did a few years ago.
Despite being a pro-European area that recorded a significantly bigger Remain vote in 2016 than even the Scotland-wide average, it elected the pro-Brexit Tory Stephen Kerr as the local MP the following year.
His margin of victory was only 148 votes. Many Remainers, particularly among the large student population at Stirling University, felt that they had sleepwalked into that outcome, and when a second chance cropped up in 2019, they resolved to show whatever discipline was required to prevent a repeat.
READ MORE: Scottish party leaders make final pitches to voters as General Election polls open
The SNP made a declaration of intent to pitch for the Remain vote by selecting as their candidate Alyn Smith, who had been a member of the European Parliament for 15 years, and had famously received rapturous applause from his fellow MEPs after asking them to “leave a light on” so Scotland can “find its way home” to the EU.
During the campaign, Smith was unusually blunt in practically making a demand for tactical votes, telling audiences at hustings that they had to vote for him even if their views aligned more closely with the policies of smaller parties, because he was the only candidate who could oust the Tories locally and stand against Brexit. That forthrightness paid handsome dividends, because by some measures the SNP’s result in Stirling proved to be their best anywhere in Scotland at the 2019 election.
The SNP have made some efforts during this year’s campaign to revive the spirit of 2019 and bring the issue of the EU back to the fore, most obviously with Stephen Flynn directly confronting Nigel Farage in the TV debates on the damage Brexit has done to people’s livelihoods.
Nevertheless, Europe is undoubtedly not quite as high a priority for voters as it was five years ago, and there must be a question mark over what will happen to Smith’s tactical coalition of support from last time if the Remainer discipline breaks down to an extent.
Some of his votes almost certainly came from natural Labour supporters, judging from the unusually big 14-point drop in the local Labour vote in 2019. That could theoretically translate into a swing back to Labour this time.
And because Stirling was previously Labour-held by substantial majorities between 1997 and 2015, there has been some chatter that Labour could even mount a serious challenge to the SNP today. But that stretches credulity somewhat given that they start with just 8% of the vote in the notional 2019 results, which take into account boundary changes that bring in Auchterarder and Gleneagles from John Nicolson’s old seat of Ochil and South Perthshire.
With the Tories able to use the 2019 result to plausibly present themselves as being in a two-horse race with the SNP, it’s possible that some Labour supporters may stick with a tactical vote for Smith.
It must be remembered that Stirling is not a particularly favourable area for independence support – it recorded a 60% No vote in the 2014 referendum. But paradoxically Smith is still one of the SNP hopefuls with the highest probability chance of being re-elected tonight.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel