THE ecstatic football-like chants of “Bowie! Bowie!” from Tory supporters as Andrew Bowie narrowly held off the SNP challenge in West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine will have grated on pro-independence ears in 2019, but if nothing else they were testament to how the SNP have breathed real life into Scottish politics over the last decade.
Bowie’s seat is one of a clear majority of Scottish constituencies that are too close to call this year, but it’s actually even harder to read than the SNP-Labour battleground seats in the Central Belt, because national opinion polls may be much less of a reliable guide to what is going on locally.
A traditional Tory rural heartland that even contains the royal family’s summer residence of Balmoral is bound to be one of the toughest constituencies anywhere in Scotland for the SNP to win, and on the one occasion when they did come out on top in 2015, it was notable that their vote share was around eight percentage points lower than their national average.
READ MORE: Scottish party leaders make final pitches to voters as General Election polls open
They were fortunate that the Liberal Democrats, who had held the seat since 1997, were effectively still on their way down as the Tories tried to re-establish themselves as the SNP’s leading local opponents.
A residual vote of 21% for the outgoing LibDem MP Sir Robert Smith ensured that the Unionist vote in the constituency was heavily split, allowing the SNP to win with a bit to spare. But by 2017 the LibDem vote had totally collapsed, probably due to an informal arrangement to give the Tories a free run in exchange for the Tories returning the favour in seats like Edinburgh West.
Bowie captured the seat by a 15-point margin, and from that point on it was murderously hard to see how the SNP were going to mount a successful comeback. It was an extraordinary achievement when their candidate Fergus Mutch came within fewer than 1000 votes of pulling off the win in 2019.
That result was achieved when the SNP were 20 points ahead of the Tories nationally, and the national polls in this year’s campaign have shown a similar gap between the two parties.
The problem is, though, that the national gap has only remained stable due to both parties’ vote share dropping by roughly the same amount and thus cancelling each other out. There’s no inevitability that the same pattern will have been replicated locally.
It’s possible that the Tory vote in the constituency is predominantly anti-SNP in nature and will have remained high as the SNP dropped back. It’s also possible that the SNP may have been able to use the incentive of defeating Bowie to shore up their own support.
And a third possibility is that the Conservatives may run into trouble due to the informal arrangement with the LibDems breaking down. Word from the ground suggests that the Lib Dems are putting in more than their token effort, and if that leads to a greater split in the Unionist vote, the SNP’s prospects could be much brighter.
The JL Partners constituency-level projection suggests the SNP have a 32% to 24% lead over the Tories in West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, with Labour’s vote share increasing sharply since 2019 and the LibDems holding steady. But other polling firms have pointed to radically different outcomes.
The only thing that can be said for certain is that if SNP candidate Glen Reynolds does oust Bowie, it would be a supreme highlight for the independence movement.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel