WITH all the noise from the General Election, it’s excusable not to have heard the starting pistol being fired on the 2026 Holyrood election.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was clear on the campaign trail he was viewing last week’s poll as a jumping off point for a Bute House bid in just under two years’ time.
The scale of the SNP’s defeat means they have now woken up to this reality.
Many in the party feel that gaining an unprecedented fifth term in office after this spectacular defeat requires a real reset.
One MP, who managed to hold onto their seat, pleaded for calm. “The first thing we’ve got to do is not panic, not get desperate and not feel like everything is doom and gloom,” they said.
With the party around six points behind Labour, it could find that the first two years of a Keir Starmer (above) government could give the SNP a boost into 2026.
The MP added: “Things change really quickly and things move on. We’ve got a very fluid political situation in Scotland.
“A lot of things are in play, we have a lot of people who haven’t made up their minds conclusively about their future voting intentions.”
Some fragments have been shored against the ruin, with some SNP figures picking out nuggets of optimism from the wreckage.
READ MORE: Inside the Glasgow count as SNP lose all six seats in disastrous night for party
One MP who lost their seat believed this defeat could sow the seeds of future success – and said they were “quite happy to take a step backwards to come forward again”.
They also highlighted high levels of support for independence as a reason for hope. “I believe the movement is there waiting to be energised”, they said.
This would involve making sure “we have the best possible team going into that 2026 election because it will be absolutely pivotal”.
There will be more like this defeated former MP. Others will be eyeing up seats in Holyrood. Their years of experience in the bear pit of Westminster will be high on their CV.
Another MP, who kept their seat, said: “Constituencies will make choices if they feel that current members of Parliament aren’t doing the job then choose somebody else, that’s always been the case.”
READ MORE: John Swinney outlines 'areas of mutual interest' in first chat with Keir Starmer
And they put a positive spin on some of their defeated colleagues finding themselves out of Parliament after nearly a decade in Westminster. “They’ve got a lot to offer,” they said.
“Isn’t that brilliant for the SNP? That we’ve got all this available to us now.”
They added: “I see that as an advantage.”
Others have made a pitch for unity within the fractured independence movement. A former MP said: “We need to seriously look at how we take our movement forward.
“If we want to be at the forefront and lead that movement then we need to bring everybody into the tent who is willing to work.”
According to Ballot Box Scotland’s Holyrood poll tracker, the SNP are projected to be neck-and-neck with Labour at the 2026 election – with 45 seats projected for John Swinney’s troops versus 44 for Sarwar.
Even with a predicted 10 seats for the Greens – and who is to say whether they would get back into bed with the SNP – that falls short of the 65 needed for an overall majority.
The heat is on for Swinney to take stock of his defeat and fashion a plan for what comes next.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel