KEIR Starmer has made the case for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in calls with regional leaders.
The Prime Minister made his first phone calls with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas on Sunday morning.
Starmer told his Israeli counterpart that he “looked forward to further deepening the close relationship” between Britain and Israel, according to a Downing Street spokesperson.
He also said he was “committed to continuing the UK and Israel’s vital cooperation to deter malign threats”.
A No 10 spokesperson added: “Turning to the conflict in Gaza, the Prime Minister reiterated his condolences for the tragic loss of life following the October attacks.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon 'personality cult' blamed for SNP defeat as 'apology' demanded
“He then set out the clear and urgent need for a ceasefire, the return of hostages and an immediate increase in the volume of humanitarian aid reaching civilians.”
In his call with president Abbas the Prime Minister said he was “pleased” to speak with the leader of the Palestinian Authority “given the pressing issues in the region, ongoing suffering and devastating loss of life in Gaza”.
A spokesperson added: “The Prime Minister updated president Abbas on his immediate priorities, including securing a ceasefire, the return of hostages, an increase and acceleration in humanitarian aid, and financial support for the Palestinian Authority.”
Starmer also told Abbas (below) that his “longstanding policy on recognition to contribute to a peace process had not changed, and it was the undeniable right of Palestinians”.
His comments to Netanyahu mark a change in the official UK stance on the situation in Palestine.
The former Conservative government was opposed to calls for an immediate ceasefire, arguing that they served to help Hamas.
Former foreign secretary David Cameron had instead called for a "sustainable ceasefire".
READ MORE: Alex Salmond shocks with admission he voted SNP at election
The conflict in the Middle East was politically toxic for the Labour leader while in opposition and promises to continue to be difficult for him in power.
He was hit by a major Commons rebellion earlier this year during a vote on demands for a ceasefire, while Labour was still officially opposed to calling for an immediate cessation in hostilities.
Many Labour MPs returned at the election faced serious challenges from pro-Palestine candidates and top lieutenant Jonathan Ashworth lost his seat to independent candidate Shockat Adam who campaigned heavily on the issue.
David Lammy (above) will also face pressure in his new role as Foreign Secretary to release the Government’s legal advice on selling arms to Israel, something he had demanded David Cameron do during his predecessor’s time in office.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel