REFORM UK have been accused of using “AI-generated candidates” in the General Election.
The party has been hit by a series of revelations about the online activities of some of its would-be MPs, from links to a British fascist leader to suggestions the UK should have remained neutral in the fight against the Nazis and admiration of Hitler’s “brilliant” ability to inspire action.
But now, there is speculation as to whether some of them even exist, with social media users pointing out that some of their pictures on leaflets appear to be AI-generated.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer urged to deliver fair and fast compensation for WASPI women
“We might be on the verge of a HUGE SCANDAL. Suspicions have been raised that Reform have fielded election candidates that aren’t real people. Is there any evidence that Mark Matlock (candidate for Clapham & Brixton Hill) actually exists? He looks AI generated,” said one user (below) in a now viral post.
We might be on the verge of a HUGE SCANDAL. Suspicions have been raised that Reform have fielded election candidates that aren’t real people. Is there any evidence that Mark Matlock (candidate for Clapham & Brixton Hill) actually exists? He looks AI generated. pic.twitter.com/0wJcR4HZXG
— Dr Bella (@Dr_BellaR) July 8, 2024
Private Eye has reported on the case of Matlock – who has almost no digital presence, not unlike many of the party’s candidates.
The magazine managed to track down the 30-year-old, who admitted the image on the flyer was partly AI-generated.
Based in the South Cotswolds, 100 miles from the constituency in which he stood, he said: "I am a real person".
READ MORE: Tories blame Twitter/X 'bug' as account disappears after election
He added, however, that his campaign image was AI-generated because there was no photo of him wearing the Reform’s trademark turquoise tie.
Byline Times, meanwhile, has reported on other elusive Reform candidates.
Council records show that the Reform candidate for Bristol South lives in Gibraltar, for example.
The Reform candidate for Leeds North East as well as Glasgow North have almost no digital footprint either – adding to many others.
The National is looking into a number of Scottish candidates with minimal digital footprint and will provide updates later this week.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel