LABOUR have been warned against building new nuclear projects in Scotland – with or without the devolved government's consent.
It comes after Scottish Secretary Ian Murray repeatedly refused to say that his Labour government would not override devolution and build new nuclear plants in Scotland.
As it stands, planning is devolved to Holyrood and the SNP government opposes new nuclear projects – but Murray suggested Labour would do what they had to in order to fulfill manifesto pledges which include new nuclear plants.
“This is really, really important,” he said. “We have a mandate for our manifesto.
“Our manifesto contains some really bold missions and policies that will transform the country, create jobs and make the cost of living crisis better for people in the longer term. And we have to make sure we can deliver those.”
Responding, Scottish Green MSP Maggie Chapman said that “more nuclear power would leave a legacy of debt and radioactive waste for generations to come”.
She went on: “Backing it is not just an expensive and toxic distraction, it undermines our journey to 100% renewable energy.
“The Scottish Greens made it clear in our manifesto that we would object to any new nuclear energy in Scotland. Nuclear is not a financially sensible option, nor is it legitimately safe.
“Scotland already produces a majority of our energy from clean, green sources, and we have so much potential to go further.
“What we need from this new Labour government is investment to rapidly expand our green industries, deliver 100% renewable energy and secure jobs for communities in the North East.”
READ MORE: 'You have blood on your hands': Ian Murray heckled as he wins Edinburgh seat
Labour have repeatedly pledged to establish a publicly owned energy investment company called GB Energy, which they say will be based in Scotland and help to drive down people’s bills.
Lynn Jamieson, the chair of the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (SCND), spoke out against further nuclear projects.
She said: “All forms of nuclear power involve environmental harm in the toxic process of uranium mining and the legacy of nuclear waste.
“Generating energy this way is more expensive financially and far more fraught with risks to humans and the environment than renewables.
“The UK Government needs a nuclear power industry to help prop up the nuclear weapons industry. Both put targets on our backs and create potential terrible harm to the rest of the world."
Murray has previously claimed that “the moral case against [nuclear weapons] is overwhelming”.
READ MORE: Airbnb landlord Ian Murray made thousands renting out Edinburgh flat
In 2015, he said that if the SNP were “truly interested in pressurising the Government [to drop nuclear] then they would make sure they had lifelong unilateralists like me on board”.
Murray is now Scottish Secretary in the UK Government, and stood on a manifesto with an explicit commitment to maintain the UK’s nuclear weapons stockpile and expand its nuclear energy capabilities.
In 2022, the Tory-run UK Government said it would not overrule Scottish ministers to build a new nuclear plant north of the Border, despite at the time also considering building a nuclear plant in Ayrshire.
In 2024, former Scottish secretary Alister Jack told the Lords Constitution Committee that he had asked the Department for Energy and Net Zero to plan for a nuclear reactor to be built in Scotland as part of a UK-wide programme.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel