A REFORM UK election agent has admitted that he has “never met” several of the candidates who ran for the party in Glasgow.
Of the six candidates running for Nigel Farage’s party in the city for the General Election, three had no visible online presence at all and were registered to addresses in England.
Helen Burns, Morag McRae and Jonathan Walmsley ran in Glasgow North, Glasgow South West and Glasgow North East respectively – amassing thousands of votes.
But David Stark – who also ran for Reform in Rutherglen and was listed as their election agent – told The National on his doorstep that he has “never met” any of them.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer on Gaza: A timeline of the new Prime Minister's position
It comes amid concern on social media over Reform candidates across the UK who appear to have almost no online presence and have never stepped foot in the area they stood in at the General Election.
A series of candidates listed on the Nigel Farage-led party’s election website only show their name and the constituency they stood in, without any information about them, or contact details beyond a generic regional email address.
Under electoral rules, the only details that need to be given about the candidate is their full name and the constituency where they live. They must all have an agent, and be nominated by 10 local voters.
When confronted about the ghost candidates, Stark told The National that he had not met any of the candidates and wasn’t sure whether any of them had ever been to Glasgow.
READ MORE: 'I am a real person': Reform candidate fumes over allegations he's AI-generated
He said that they were Reform members from England and were chosen given the time constraints with the election.
“They've got votes. It gives people a chance to vote Reform,” Stark said.
He added: “We had two weeks to organise 57 candidates in Scotland. Inevitably, some of them were paper candidates.
“Various people who were chosen were away on holiday or business and we had to substitute with other people. That's just what happens. I'm sure other parties have done the same thing.”
While paper candidates, who stand little chance of winning and therefore don’t campaign, are not uncommon in UK politics, it is rare for so little information to be available about candidates online.
Reform’s chairman (above), meanwhile, said he is “steaming mad” about the accusations.
Richard Tice denied reports his party used AI-generated candidates after one social media user’s post went viral, saying: “Is there any evidence that Mark Matlock (candidate for Clapham & Brixton Hill) actually exists? He looks AI generated.”
We might be on the verge of a HUGE SCANDAL. Suspicions have been raised that Reform have fielded election candidates that aren’t real people. Is there any evidence that Mark Matlock (candidate for Clapham & Brixton Hill) actually exists? He looks AI generated. pic.twitter.com/0wJcR4HZXG
— Dr Bella (@Dr_BellaR) July 8, 2024
Private Eye magazine managed to track down Matlock who admitted the image on the flyer was partly AI-generated because there was no photo of him wearing the Reform’s trademark turquoise tie, but he has since also appeared on GB News to show he is indeed real.
Reform have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel