EXPERTS have welcomed Labour’s pledge of more funding for GP services – but warned that diverting money from hospitals to free up cash is a “terrible idea”.
It comes after Health Secretary Wes Streeting, in his first major policy announcement since taking office, said that billions of pounds would be taken from NHS hospital budgets in order to fund GP services.
Speaking from a GP surgery in London, Streeting said: “Patients are finding it harder than ever to see a GP. Patients can’t get through the front door of the NHS, so they aren’t getting the timely care they need.
“That’s no surprise, when GPs and primary care have been receiving a smaller proportion of NHS resources. I’m committed to reversing that.”
Responding to the announcement, the British Medical Association (BMA) warned that diverting money from cash-strapped hospitals was only moving problems around, not solving them.
And Dr Julia Patterson, the chief executive of the EveryDoctor campaign group, warned: "NHS GP services desperately need more money, because in many places surgeries cannot even hire enough GPs at the moment. However, diverting money from NHS hospitals is a terrible idea.
“There are millions of patients waiting for NHS treatment, and huge problems with A&E overcrowding and long waits too. Streeting and [Prime Minister Keir] Starmer need to come up with a robust plan to save lives as an emergency."
Dr David Wrigley, deputy chair of the BMA’s English GP Committee, said: “The Government’s commitment to reversing years of inadequate funding in general practice in England will be transformative for patient care, and no doubt comes as a great reassurance to many overworked and undervalued GPs and practice staff.
READ MORE: Alyn Smith: SNP party structures and staffing 'not fit for purpose'
“General practice is broken. We have lost the equivalent of 1715 full-time, fully qualified GPs since 2015, and our teams are delivering an average of 1.45 million appointments a day for just 30p a day for every patient registered with us. That’s less than the cost of an apple.
“We applaud Mr Streeting’s ambition to shift more NHS care into the community, but hospitals need funding just as desperately as general practice does.
“Hospitals are under extreme financial pressure, with many being left with no option but to implement recruitment freezes despite record waiting lists. Diverting money away from them isn’t solving the overall problem – the NHS as a whole needs to be properly resourced.
“Just 6% of the overall budget is guaranteed for general practice, and we want to understand how Mr Streeting plans to boost that without cutting hospital funding.”
Wrigley added that the GPC he sits on had proposed “other, more immediate, solutions” to the issues in GP funding, “such as streamlining existing funding into the core contract to ensure practices can keep their doors open and care for their communities”.
READ MORE: 'Fell short': BBC scolded over claim about Scottish votes at General Election
Elsewhere in his first week on the job, Streeting has looked to end the junior doctor strikes in England – although said pay demands of a 35% raise are undoable – and also said he will end the “begging bowl culture” of the Department of Health and Social Care.
Streeting has said that his health department will focus on economic growth – and acknowledged people’s “legitimate” concerns about the future of the NHS.
The Labour MP said there is “palpable anxiety” among the British public about whether the NHS will survive – but that he is “optimistic” about the future.
He said the NHS needs “tough love” and promised to drive forward reform that will help the health and care system to “survive in the 21st century”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel