A NUMBER of peers have ceased to be a member of the House of Lords due to non-attendance.
Former deputy prime minister John Prescott is the most high-profile of the six peers to have left, marking the end of a parliamentary career stretching back more than 50 years.
The departure from the upper house was also announced of one-time jailbirds Jeffrey Archer and Conrad Black.
Labour peer Lord Prescott had only spoken once in the chamber since suffering a stroke in 2019, official records show, and he had not voted since February 2023.
READ MORE: Wes Streeting: NHS must 'end begging bowl culture and focus on growth'
The 86-year-old was first elected as a Hull MP in 1970.
He remained in the Commons until 2010 when he joined the Lords.
The former trade union activist served 10 years as Tony Blair’s deputy prime minister after Labour’s 1997 general election landslide.
During much of that time, he acted as a mediator in the often turbulent relationship between Blair and chancellor Gordon Brown.
Prescott (below) once famously punched a protester who threw an egg at him during an election campaign visit to North Wales in 2001.
While a loyal supporter of Blair in office, Lord Prescott was subsequently critical of parts of New Labour’s legacy, denouncing Britain’s involvement in the Iraq War.
He also strongly defended Jeremy Corbyn during his time as party leader in the face of fierce criticism.
Lord Prescott was among a number of peers who Lord Speaker Lord McFall of Alcluith declared on Wednesday “had ceased to be members of the House by virtue of non-attendance in the last session of Parliament”.
He said: “In so doing, I should like to thank all the noble lords and baronesses for their many years of service to the House and Parliament.”
Others whose membership ended due to non-attendance included former media mogul Lord Black of Crossharbour.
The ex-proprietor of the Daily Telegraph and a number of other world newspapers served more than three years in prison after being convicted of fraud and obstruction of justice in 2007.
The Canadian-born British citizen was pardoned by then US president Donald Trump in 2019.
Lord Black was the former head of Hollinger International, which once owned the Daily Telegraph, Chicago Sun-Times, Jerusalem Post and hundreds of community papers in the US and Canada.
He was ennobled in 2001, having renounced his Canadian citizenship to become a Conservative peer.
His downfall came in 2007 when jurors in Chicago found that he and other Hollinger International executives swindled shareholders out of more than six million dollars (then worth around £3 million) of their money.
There are no records of Lord Black having spoken in the Lords and he had not voted since 2003.
Lord McFall also announced the retirement from the House of bestselling novelist Lord Archer of Weston-Super-Mare with effect from July 4.
He took his seat in the unelected chamber in 1992.
The former Tory peer had remained a member of the Lords despite being sentenced to four years in prison in 2001 after being found guilty of perjury and perverting the course of justice in a previous libel case when he sued a newspaper over reports about money he gave to a prostitute.
There are no records of Lord Archer having spoken in the chamber and he is shown to have voted just five times, the last in 2017 after a 17-year gap.
His only experience listed outside of Parliament was as a former president of the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association (WPBSA) – a post he held from 1997-99.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel