THE Reform UK candidate for Glasgow North has been found after concerns were raised about whether they existed.
Helen Burns has insisted “I do indeed exist” after voters could find no social media presence linking her to Reform, and she failed to campaign in the area or appear at the count on July 4, leading some to claim she was a fake name on the ballot paper.
It has since been revealed that Burns lives in the East Midlands and stood in Glasgow North as a “paper candidate” because Scotland holds a “special place in [her] heart”.
READ MORE: New SNP frontbench roles confirmed after loss of seats at General Election
Burns came fourth in the seat, winning 1655 votes. Labour’s Martin Rhodes was elected as MP, beating the SNP’s Alison Thewliss.
Speaking to The Telegraph from her home in Coalville – some 280 miles away from Glasgow – Burns said she “didn’t need” to visit the city ahead of the election.
“Hello, I am here and I do exist. I am a real person. All the people who stood for our party are really people,” she said.
“I stood for a constituency in Scotland as the country holds a very special place in my heart.
“We have travelled to many areas in Scotland over the past 20 years, and indeed got married in a small hunting lodge near Aviemore in 2019. This was featured in Scottish Wedding Magazine.”
READ MORE: New SNP MP takes dig at monarchy as he's sworn in
Burns, who works as a PA for Reform and whose husband has “Scottish roots”, added: “A snap election had been called, and Reform, which I have officially represented since the start of the year, had hoped to have a candidate in every single constituency.
“Some hopeful candidates couldn’t stand because there wasn’t enough time to get the vetting.
“Our constituents were really upset in some areas asking why there wasn’t a Reform candidate representing them. I was a paper candidate and was given every opportunity to represent my constituency.
“But I didn’t go there, I didn’t need to. I have visited Glasgow many times in the past.”
Reform election agent has 'never met' Glasgow candidates
Burns is just one of several Reform candidates in Scotland who have minimal public presence.
The National previously tracked down the election agent for the Reform candidates who stood in Glasgow, who he admitted he has “never met”.
Gawain Towler, a spokesman for Reform UK, said that the suggestions that they had fielded fake candidates on the ballot papers were “preposterous”.
READ MORE: I tried to find Reform UK 'ghost candidates' in Glasgow - here's what happened
“It is as if people have never heard of paper candidates before, this has been a part of the British political system for longer than we have been alive,” he told The Telegraph.
He said that because the election was called at such short notice they had very little time to find candidates and even the Conservative Party, which called the poll, did not have a “full slate”.
After Rishi Sunak announced the date, Reform “called round and asked if there was anyone willing to stand as a paper candidate” and many agreed, he said.
“Why would we have put up fake candidates? If we wanted fake candidates then we would have put up a full slate, but we didn’t,” he said.
Reform stood a candidate in every seat in Scotland for the General Election. The party received 7% of the vote share across Scotland, winning 167,979 votes – more than the Scottish Greens.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel