Welcome to our Branch Office Updates newsletter, where we delve deep into the latest Scottish Labour news, gaffes and analysis. You can subscribe here to receive it every week straight in your inbox!
SCOTTISH Labour have minimal influence over UK Labour policy, Jeremy Corbyn has said.
Speaking in an exclusive interview with The National, the former Labour leader's comments come after Anas Sarwar claimed in his manifesto that electing his MP’s put Scotland at the “beating heart of a Labour government”.
After a sweeping General Election win for his party in Scotland last week, the Scottish Labour leader said his 37 Scottish MPs are “not going to Westminster to sit on the opposition benches, to shout, to protest, and ultimately come back with nothing”.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn calls Westminster oath of allegiance 'a load of nonsense'
Sarwar added: "They are going to sit on the government benches, to sit round the table and make decisions for the people of Scotland.
But when Corbyn was asked whether he believes Scottish Labour have much influence over UK party policy, he responded: “No, I don’t think they do.
“I think Scottish Labour obviously have influence over candidate selection in Scotland because that's devolved to them. They also have influence over resources and allocation."
He (below) then said: “But in terms of overall policy, I think that the Labour Party [and Keir Starmer] have become very centralised.”
Corbyn added: “On the direction, I think they [Scottish Labour] will want to have influence.
“Whether they will succeed – I'm not really so sure.”
At the General Election, Corbyn held his seat of Islington North, where he has been MP since 1983, holding off the Labour challenge after being kicked out of the party.
He collected 24,120 votes, compared to Labour candidate Praful Nargund's 16,873, winning a majority of more than 7000.
But Corbyn also spoke of his time as Labour leader between 2015 and 2020, including the 2017 General Election where he won 3 million more votes than Keir Starmer, and the frosty reception he got from some in Scottish Labour when visiting Scotland.
Corbyn spoke of a leaked dossier in 2020 that suggested that Labour party officials opposed to his leadership worked to lose the 2017 general election – where he won 3 million more votes UK-wide than Starmer – with the hope that a bad result would help oust him.
READ MORE: Four pro-Palestine independent candidates beat Labour in General Election
“What I was trying to do in the 2017 election was to take the campaign out on an assertive demand around the country of the kind of social justice offer we were making – by public meetings, rallies, demonstrations And my team were pushing very hard,” he said.
“And what the leaked dossier confirms is that there were senior officials of the Labour Party that didn't want any of that and spent an awful lot of time undermining it.”
Corbyn added: “And in Scotland, there was a refusal by some of the officials in Scottish Labour to use the slogan “for the many, not the few.”
“Some of them didn't seem terribly keen on on me being in Scotland. Whereas the reception I got from the public and from some of our candidates was fine. It was wonderful and I felt very much at home there.”
Corbyn added that the “same cultural opposition” to him also existed in the Scottish Labour office.
“I just got the feeling that some of the people in Scottish Labour, not all of them, were simply interested in getting position in place for the future.
“They didn't understand the message we were putting forward.”
A Scottish labour spokesperson said: "Mr Corbyn is not a member of the Labour Party and is entitled to his own views."
Check out our full exclusive interview with Jeremy Corbyn in this week's Sunday National.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel