LIZ Truss has blamed Rishi Sunak’s trashing of her "record” for the Conservative Party’s defeat in the General Election.
In an article for The Telegraph, Truss claimed that she had stayed quiet during the General Election campaign in an attempt “to prevent further damage to the party”.
However, she goes on to say that the time had come for her to “speak out” and detail the reasons she felt her party lost 250 seats.
The UK’s shortest serving prime minister said that the failure of successive Tory governments to “reverse” Tony Blair’s agenda on regulation and tax were to blame, as well as not dealing with “the wokery sweeping through our schools and institutions”.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer condemns 'appalling' shooting at Donald Trump rally
“This abandonment of Conservative principles not only led to him [Sunak] getting no credit from the voters for cutting National Insurance,” she said.
“But also led to an even larger General Election defeat as he continued to trash my record and promote Labour’s false narrative that the global rise in mortgage rates was somehow my fault.”
Truss became the first former PM in nearly a century to lose her seat at a General Election.
Despite resigning after just seven weeks in Number 10 following her disastrous mini-Budget, Truss claimed that the party’s failure to repeal or amend human rights legislation was also to blame for the defeat.
Liz Truss claimed that Labour's policies from more a decade ago were to blame for her party's defeat
“We made no effort to amend or repeal legislation like the Human Rights Act and Equality Act, which embedded the Left-wing human rights culture and identity politics agenda into virtually every area of our lives,” she said.
“Too often our response was nervously to tinker, rather than to dismantle the Leftist technocratic state we were bequeathed in 2010.”
Truss’s comments add to the already fractious climate within the Conservative Party following the General Election, with prominent MPs and potential leadership candidates Kemi Badenoch and Suella Braverman already entering into a public spat.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel