THE new head of the Government’s defence review has dialled up official rhetoric on China, blasting the country as a member of a “deadly quartet” including Iran, Russia and North Korea.
Lord Robertson, who Keir Starmer has appointed to lead the review, warned that the UK must be read to “confront” those nations.
The strategic defence review launched by Labour aims to examine how to strengthen the UK’s homeland security, aid Ukraine in its war against Russia, and modernise and maintain the nuclear deterrent.
It will also set out a roadmap on how to reach Starmer’s target of spending 2.5% of gross domestic product – a measure of the size of the economy – on defence.
Former prime minister Rishi Sunak had set a 2030 goal for spending 2.5%, at a cumulative cost of £75 billion over six years, but the new Labour administration has yet to commit to a timetable.
The co-operation between Russian president Vladimir Putin (above) and his allies has alarmed Western leaders, with Nato’s summit in Washington last week declaring that Beijing and Moscow had a “deepening strategic partnership” while Iran and North Korea are “fuelling Russia’s war of aggression”.
The Washington summit declaration said China had become a “decisive enabler” of the Russian war effort through the supply of components to the defence industry.
READ MORE: Labour will not change two-child cap with King's Speech, Angela Rayner says
Lord Robertson told reporters: “We’re confronted by a deadly quartet of nations increasingly working together, and we in this country, and the Nato alliance that met so successfully last week, has got to be able to confront that particular quartet as well as the other problems that are pervading the world at the present moment.”
The Labour peer, a former Nato secretary general and defence secretary, will work with former US presidential advisor Fiona Hill and ex-joint forces command chief General Sir Richard Barrons.
The Prime Minister said: “We live in a more dangerous and volatile world. My Government will forge a new clear-eyed approach to our national defences, equipping us to tackle international threats head-on while keeping the British people safe and secure.”
As part of the process, a defence review team will be established to engage with serving and retired members of the armed forces, the defence industry, the general public, academics, Parliament and the UK’s allies.
Defence Secretary John Healey (above) will oversee the review and he will be regularly updated on progress, in addition to the Prime Minister and the Chancellor.
READ MORE: Welsh Labour First Minister to step down after government mutiny
Healey said: “At the start of a new era for Britain, we need a new era for defence. Hollowed-out armed forces, procurement waste and neglected morale cannot continue.
“In response, our armed forces need to be better ready to fight, more integrated and more innovative. We need clearer accountability, faster delivery, less waste and better value for money.
“The review will ensure that defence is central to the future security of Britain and to its economic growth and prosperity.”
Labour’s manifesto had committed to conduct the review within its first year in office, but Starmer is said to want the work to be completed much sooner.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel