FERGUSON Marine's CEO has said his yard will be bidding against "unfair competition" in trying to secure the next CalMac ferry contract.
It comes after it was announced on Tuesday that the yard was refused a direct award for the Scottish Government's new £175 million contract for seven ferries.
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said that from her understanding of the tender, the yard would still be eligible to put out a bid.
Speaking at the Port Glasgow shipyard on Thursday, John Petticrew said: "We have to bid against, in my opinion, unfair competition.
"The countries we're bidding against, we all know their governments are putting money into their shipyards."
READ MORE: 'Why not Scotland?': Questions as UK hosts small European nations at key summit
Later on, he said he would be "disappointed" if state subsidy of foreign shipyards meant the yard loses out on future bids.
Most countries with substantial shipbuilding industries subsidise their yards, however the UK slowly ceased to do so in the 1970s and 1980s.
Poland and Turkey, which have either built or are contracted to build many of CalMac's large ferries, both have some form of subsidy for their shipbuilding industries.
During Tuesday's press briefing, it was also announced that Ferguson Marine would receive £14.2mn in funding to help it bid for work in the future.
READ MORE: Rivers of human waste and polluted water reveal scale of catastrophe in Gaza
Though hopes for the yard getting the new contract seemed low on Tuesday, officials still intend for the firm to put ahead a bid.
The Deputy FM also said that the decision to not directly award the contract to the yard came down to legal concerns.
Forbes said: "The reason it's not being awarded is because of the legal uncertainties and risks. When it comes to direct award, we have to satisfy the Consumer and Markets Authority.
"This is a very sensitive sector, it is designated as a sensitive sector, and that means there would be significant risks if we were to proceed down that route.
"It would create the worst of both worlds where the yard doesn't actually secure the work which they need to keep jobs, and the islanders don't get their vessels."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel