A REFUGEE expert has labelled Labour's migration plans "overwhelmingly harmful".
Writing on Twitter/X, Daniel Sohege broke down Labour's migration policies as outlined in the King's Speech piece by piece, and could find few points he agreed with.
He said: "What Labour has done today in the policies it has announced is play straight into the business model of gangs, smuggling and trafficking, and potentially leave people seeking safety at more risk.
Okay, a, very, long thread on @UKLabour's asylum and border policies announced today in the #KingSpeech. The short version to start though is that they are, aside from processing applications and cancelling the Rwanda plan, overwhelmingly harmful. 1/https://t.co/nWCFDTApID pic.twitter.com/03OipWyOQI
— Dan Sohege 🧡 (@stand_for_all) July 17, 2024
"No suggestion of investing in community support schemes, which are vastly cheaper as well as more suitable, to provide accommodation for people seeking asylum while they are having their claims processed.
"There was also no mention of providing people seeking asylum with better right to work options – a policy which even had cross-party support under the last government."
He criticised plans to increase enforcement, as well as the aim to "fast-track returns" for people coming from "safe countries".
READ MORE: Baby dies after contracting whooping cough in Scotland as cases soar
Sohege wrote: "Increased border security actually strengthens smuggling gangs.
"You aren't tackling criminals with this. What you are doing is actually increasing their grip. I know all this sounds counter-intuitive, but in all things there is balance.
"You go too far one way, you get unintended, or in this case well documented, consequences."
He went on to explain that people fleeing places where they felt unsafe often faced dire consequences after being returned.
"When people are returned, the [smuggling] gangs don't just walk away. They make an example of you so others don't speak to the authorities."
READ MORE: 'Why not Scotland?': Questions as UK hosts small European nations at key summit
He also pointed to the general inability of enforcement in the English Channel to stop people trying to seek asylum.
"[Smuggling by boat] actually makes up a tiny proportion of channel crossings.
"Traffickers are more likely to bring people in via other routes, often on visas through 'official ports of entry', such as airports, with false promises and then exploit them once they arrive."
Some parts of the bill did draw Sohege's approval, though, such as the discarding of the Rwanda scheme.
He also thought the enabling of more claims to be processed was beneficial.
Keir Starmer said during a press conference on Thursday that: "There’s no easy silver bullet, if there was it would have been fired a long time ago.
“It’s difficult, it’s hard, it’s challenging but I’m absolutely convinced it’s a very serious problem and it requires a very serious response.
“And that’s why we have put to one side the gimmick of Rwanda and are pursuing the serious response which is to smash the gangs that are running this vile trade.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel