A LABOUR minister has blamed economic circumstances for the UK Government's refusal to abolish the two-child benefit cap.
Labour have faced consistent pressure to scrap the limit since before the election, from charities and their own backbenchers.
The SNP have been calling for the measure to be scrapped since its introduction in 2017, with hundreds of thousands more children being plunged into poverty since then.
Calls to abolish the two-child limit come against a background of rising child poverty, with more than four million children now living in low-income households.
READ MORE: David Davis calls for more Holyrood powers to look into Alex Salmond case
Leader of the House of Commons Lucy Powell pointed to Labour’s proposals for a ministerial taskforce, aimed at establishing a child poverty strategy, when challenged over the cap.
During business questions on Thursday, Labour backbencher Kim Johnson (Liverpool Riverside) said: “Forty-seven per cent of children in my Liverpool Riverside constituency are living in poverty.
“That’s nearly one in two children and I’m sure the Leader of the House will agree with me that that is unacceptable.
“And while I welcome the Prime Minister’s announcement yesterday for the taskforce, it did not mention the removal of a two-child cap.”
Powell said she understands this is “an issue very close to her heart”.
She added: “As an incoming Labour Government, we are absolutely committed to tackling child poverty and all the root causes of child poverty, which is why the Prime Minister announced the Government taskforce looking at these matters yesterday.
“We were clear in our manifesto that the economic circumstances do not currently allow for us to abolish the cap.
“Economic stability is the single biggest thing we can do to ensure that children don’t fall into poverty, because when the economy crashes, it’s the poorest in society who pay the heaviest price.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel