ISRAEL’S national security minister visited Jerusalem’s most sensitive holy site yesterday, threatening to disrupt Gaza ceasefire talks.
Itamar Ben-Gvir, an ultranationalist settler leader, said he had gone up to the contested Jerusalem hilltop compound of Al-Aqsa Mosque to pray for the return of the hostages “but without a reckless deal, without surrendering”.
The move threatened to disrupt sensitive talks aimed at reaching a ceasefire in the nine-month-old Israel-Hamas war. Israeli negotiators landed in Egypt on Wednesday to continue talks.
Ben-Gvir’s visit also came just days before Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu leaves for a trip to the United States, where he will address Congress.
The minister said, while standing in front of the golden dome of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, that he “is praying and working hard” to ensure that Netanyahu will not give in to international pressure and will continue with the military campaign in Gaza.
Ben-Gvir last visited the site in May, to protest against countries unilaterally recognising Palestinian statehood.
READ MORE: Top UN official demands Israel be 'unseated' from organisation
He has been convicted eight times for offences including racism and supporting a terrorist organisation. As a teenager, his views were so extreme that the army banned him from compulsory military service.
As security minister, Ben-Gvir oversees the country’s police force. As a key coalition partner, he also has the power to rob Netanyahu of his parliamentary majority and try to force early elections.
Ben-Gvir has used his influence to push forward pet projects and encourage Netanyahu to press ahead with the war in Gaza in the face of widespread calls to reach a ceasefire deal that would bring home hostages.
The Palestinian foreign ministry condemned Ben-Gvir’s visit as a “provocative intrusion” that endangered the fragile status quo regarding the Jerusalem hilltop compound, which is considered holy for both Muslims and Jews. The site is revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, and by Muslims as Haram al-Sharif, a holy site and important national symbol.
Ben-Gvir has frequently visited the site during times of conflict, drawing condemnation. Tensions over the compound have fuelled past rounds of violence.
People take part in a pro-Palestine march in central London organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. (Image: Tejas Sandhu/PA Wire)
In an overnight session that lasted into yesterday morning, Israel’s parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state. The vote was largely symbolic and meant to send a message ahead of Netanyahu’s trip to the US.
Meanwhile, overnight into yesterday Israeli strikes in central Gaza killed at least 11 people, according to the Hamas-run Civil Defence organisation and hospitals. At least two children and two women were killed in air strikes on a house and a car.
In recent weeks, Israel has stepped up strikes in central Gaza, where many Palestinians have fled to escape fighting in other parts of the beleaguered territory.
READ MORE: 'Violent' Police Scotland response to Palestine protest condemned
The war in Gaza, which was sparked by Hamas’s October 7 attack on southern Israel, has killed more than 38,600 people, according to the territory’s Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between combatants and civilians in its count.
The war has created a humanitarian catastrophe in the coastal Palestinian territory, displaced most of its 2.3 million population and triggered widespread hunger.
Hamas’s October attack killed 1200 people, mostly civilians, and militants took about 250 hostage. About 120 remain in captivity, with about a third of them believed to be dead, according to Israeli authorities.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel