TWO-THIRDS of residents in some of Scotland’s coastal communities fear a decline in the health of fisheries in the last two decades, a survey has found.
Research by Survation found that across Scotland, 40% of people think the health of the country’s fisheries has declined in the past 20 years.
But in coastal communities – including villages and towns such as Eyemouth, Fraserburgh, Kinlochbervie, Kirkcudbright, Lochinver, Oban, Portree, Stonehaven, Troon, Ullapool and Wick – that rose to 67%.
The research – which also found 86% believe the way Scotland’s fish populations are managed is important for the resilience and viability of coastal communities – was commissioned by the Our Seas Coalition and released as it launched a new multi-media exhibition aimed at showcasing the voices of people from coastal communities.
READ MORE: Scottish shipyard wins multi-million-pound salmon vessel contract
The Coastal Testimonies exhibition, which is launching in Eyemouth in the Borders before touring Scotland in the coming months, saw more than 60 people discuss their hopes for the future of the seas around Scotland.
Those who provided testimonies and who were photographed included commercial fishermen, sea anglers, politicians, naturalists, scientists, community groups, artists, and those with recreational interests in the sea – with each person speaking directly about their own connection to the water.
Ian McWhinney, a fisherman from Badachro in Wester Ross, spoke about whether any of his children will be able to follow him into the industry, saying: “In my lifetime, I have seen all sorts of inshore fisheries collapse.
“So unless we do something about it very soon, I find it very difficult that they’ll have a future in the fishing industry here because there won’t be a fishing industry left.”
Mariel ten Doeschate, a cetacean scientist from Inverness, told the project: “The future of our seas depend on how we act in the next couple of years, the decisions we’re going to make, and if we’re going to listen to the evidence and take the precautionary approach.
“I think that’s what’s going to make or break the difference really.”
Hayley Wolcott, co-ordinator of the Our Seas Coalition, which brings together more than 140 coastal businesses, community groups, fishermen’s associations and environmental organisations, said the project had been set up to “promote a better understanding of inshore environmental and fisheries issues” by using personal accounts to “inspire greater dialogue and action within communities”.
Wolcott added: “The testimonies speak for themselves. It is moving to read the deep respect and understanding that people have for their seas.
“Our surveys suggest that concern about the condition of our ocean is actually already highest in coastal communities, because they are closest to the many issues facing our marine environment.
“However, coastal communities are often marginalised in decision-making. It is so important that decision-makers listen to the people living close to the sea, people in communities who see changes through the generations and want to see better political decisions.
“This project is all about empowering people within their communities to speak up, share their first-hand experiences and talk with each other about how to safeguard the precious interconnections between people and the life in our sea.
“We all rely upon the sea, but we have a duty to look after what provides for us.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel