CLIMATE campaigners have complained about Scottish ministers’ handling of plans for a new gas-fuelled power station in Peterhead.
Friends of the Earth Scotland say John Swinney and other ministers have treated the plans from SSE and Norwegian oil giant Equinor as a “foregone conclusion”.
The companies say their plans for a new 910-megawatt gas power station and carbon capture facility will ultimately replace an existing plant and slash emissions.
READ MORE: Community group to host 'summer festival of solidarity' in Glasgow
A number of environmental organisations have already called on the First Minister to reject the plans.
Scotland on Sunday reported that Friends of the Earth Scotland have written to the First Minister alleging 28 separate breaches of the ministerial code.
The campaigning charity points to meetings between ministers, civil servants and developers, saying records of these talks are not available.
Friends of the Earth Scotland also claim several statements from ministers could have prejudiced the planning process, including the then-first minister Humza Yousaf saying he was “really impressed” with the site’s future plans during a visit to Peterhead last year.
Alex Lee, a climate campaigner at Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: “These 28 breaches of the ministerial code show a deeply troubling pattern of behaviour right across the Scottish Government.
“Public concerns have been deliberately ignored to try and push through a climate-damaging planning application in the interests of greedy energy companies.
READ MORE: Mike Small: The treatment of the Whole Truth Five is Britain's Niemoller moment
“Ministers and civil servants have been caught out playing fast and loose with the rules, in favour of a polluting project that risks locking households into higher energy bills for decades to come.
“Our investigations show that the Scottish Government has treated the outcome of this planning application as a foregone conclusion right from the beginning and has failed to follow the planning process and assess the evidence objectively.”
A Scottish Government spokeswoman told the newspaper: “The Scottish Government will consider any complaint in line with usual practice.
“It would not be appropriate to comment on a live planning application.
“A decision will be taken by ministers in due course, following consideration of the application information, consultation responses and representations made by members of the public.”
In May, a spokesperson for SSE Thermal said: “Credible organisations such as the Climate Change Committee are clear that carbon capture technology will be essential to decarbonising the power system on the way to net zero.
“As Scotland’s only large-scale flexible power station, decarbonising Peterhead is of significant importance which is why we continue to progress plans for the new Peterhead carbon capture power station, which would provide vital low-carbon flexible back-up to renewables.
“The new plant will ultimately replace the existing station and in doing so will deliver huge emissions reductions.
“We are also exploring how to neutralise residual emissions through negative emissions technologies, recognising the importance of this to reaching net zero.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel