STEPHEN Flynn has called on Scottish Labour MPs to back his amendment to end the two-child benefit cap.
In Labour's first major test on their pledge to eradicate child poverty, Flynn (below) has received cross-party support for his amendment set to be voted upon on Tuesday.
The SNP Westminster Leader’s call comes after Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar previously supported scrapping the cap.
READ MORE: John Swinney to set out new funding for 'landmark' carbon capture project
With the crunch vote this week, the amendment is backed by the SNP, Plaid Cymru, Green Party, SDLP, Alliance Party and independent MPs, including former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn (below).
The two-child cap fallout has dominated the Labour Government's first King’s Speech after Keir Starmer launched a “child poverty taskforce” instead of committing to scrapping the cap.
On Sunday, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves repeated the party’s position that the cap would not be scrapped, whilst Labour MP Zarah Sultana said that doing so is “a matter of political will” and Labour “can fund this commitment if we want to.”
‘We’ll vote to do the right thing by those bairns’
New figures published by Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) found 1.6 million children are impacted by the Labour government's two-child benefit cap - with families losing up to £3455 a year per child.
The charity found 300,000 children would be lifted out of poverty, and a further 700,000 would be in less deep poverty, if the two-child cap was abolished.
READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: We need a brand new strategy to help drive independence forward
In June, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) published its own analysis warning the two-child limit will affect 670,000 additional children by the end of this parliament unless it is scrapped.
Commenting, Flynn said: “We’ve worked constructively with other groups in Westminster to deliver a cross-party movement to scrap the child benefit cap but, sadly, no Labour MP from Scotland appears willing to join these efforts.
“Anas Sarwar and his Labour MPs in Scotland have said the cap should go, and our amendment gives them the opportunity to put those words into action – it’s a fairly easy test for them to pass should they wish to do so.
“The two-child cap was the Tories operating at their worst, so scrapping the cap would deliver on the promise made to the public for real change.
"Every child poverty charity in Scotland and beyond recognises that this policy penalises children and keeps them rooted in poverty. We’ll vote to do the right thing by those bairns and I would encourage other Scottish MPs to do likewise.”
Questioned about the pressure on Labour to lift the two-child benefit cap during an interview broadcast on BBC1 on Sunday morning, Reeves (below) said she was not willing to make any unfunded spending commitments.
She said on Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: “We were really clear during the election that we were not going to make spending commitments without being able to say where the money was going to come from.
“If we’re not able to say where the money is going to come from, we can’t promise to do it. That’s true when it comes to the two-child limit and anything else.
“Previous Labour governments have lifted kids out of poverty, it is what is in our DNA. We will do that, but I’m not willing to make unfunded commitments.”
A UK Government spokesperson said: “As the PM has made clear, no child should be in poverty – and the Government is committed to developing an ambitious strategy to reduce child poverty and give children the best start in life.
“The new ministerial taskforce will explore how we can use all the available levers across government to create an ambitious strategy, and we will continue to work closely with all of the devolved governments as we bring forward this urgent work.”
Scottish Labour have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel