KEIR Starmer said there is “no silver bullet” to end child poverty but that “it’s good that we’re having a debate” about the two-child benefit cap as he faces growing pressure for the measure to be dropped.
The Prime Minister acknowledged the “passion” of Labour MPs considering rebelling over the continuation of the policy that affects some 1.6 million children.
Against the background of rising child poverty – with more than four million now living in low-income households – he has been urged by charities, opposition parties and some of his own backbenchers to abolish the limit.
The SNP have tabled an amendment to the King's Speech which calls for an end to the two-child cap. Westminster group leader Stephen Flynn has received cross-party support for the proposal to be voted on on Tuesday.
It is understood to have the support of former Labour leader and now independent MP Jeremy Corbyn, as well as the Green and Plaid Cymru MPs.
But Starmer has declined to repeat Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson’s earlier suggestion that scrapping the two-child benefit cap will be “considered” by the Government.
READ MORE: John Swinney to set out new funding for carbon capture project
The Labour leadership has so far suggested the state of the public finances means they cannot afford to axe the benefit limit unless economic growth is secured first.
Left-wing Labour and opposition MPs are expected to criticise the policy in Monday’s King’s Speech debate, with a possible vote if Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle selects an amendment on Tuesday.
Speaking at the Farnborough International Airshow, Starmer said: “I’m not surprised that there’s a real passion about this in the Labour Party, you’d expect there to be.
“Child poverty is something that we need to eradicate. And there’s a very strong feeling in the Labour Party, Labour movement about that.”
That was why he set up a new taskforce to tackle child poverty, he said, but added: “There is no silver bullet. If there was a silver bullet it would have been shot a very long time ago.”
There was a “complicated set of factors” including pay, benefits, work, housing, education and health “and that is why you need a strategy to deal with it”.
He evaded a question about whether he agreed with Phillipson (above), who earlier said ditching the limit would be looked at “as one of a number of ways” to lift children out of poverty.
The Prime Minister said: “What the Education Secretary said this morning I agree with, which is she’s passionate about tackling poverty and child poverty in particular.”
READ MORE: Home Office ordered to 'intensify' deportation of undocumented migrants
Pointing to Phillipson’s background growing up in hardship, he said: “I’m very pleased that she’s one of the chairs of our taskforce on tackling child poverty, and we will make sure that the strategy covers all the bases to drive down child poverty.”
Phillipson earlier said the possible scrapping of the limit would be part of a review by the taskforce she is spearheading with Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall.
The Cabinet minister told Sky News: “Unfortunately it’s also a very expensive measure, but we will need to consider it as one of a number of levers in terms of how we make sure we lift children out of poverty.
“Housing is a big factor … The fact that for lots of families work doesn’t pay in the way that it should, and that increasingly what we see is that children are growing up in poverty where there is at least one person in that household in work.
“We will look at every measure in terms of how we can address this terrible blight that scars the life chances of too many children.”
Downing Street denied that the Government had changed its position on the cap after Phillipson’s comments, emphasising Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s refusal to make any unfunded spending commitments.
Asked whether the Education Secretary had spoken out of turn, Starmer's spokesman said: “No. I think she talked about the fact that there are a range of measures that we will need to consider in terms of how we respond to this, that we will look at every measure in terms of how we can address this terrible blight that scars the life chances of too many children.”
The spokesman said “nothing’s out of the scope of the taskforce”, when pressed on whether the possible scrapping of the limit was within its remit.
The cap was introduced by then-Conservative chancellor George Osborne in 2015 and restricts child welfare payments to the first two children born to most families.
Labour MP Rosie Duffield said in a Sunday newspaper the two-child benefit cap amounts to “social cleansing” and is an “anti-feminist and unequal piece of legislation”.
“It legislates against women’s autonomy over their own bodies, the exact opposite of anything that could possibly be described as a Labour Party value,” she wrote in an article for The Sunday Times.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel