A growing number Labour MPs are speaking out against the policy (Image: Canva)
KEIR Starmer faces his first threat of rebellion in the Commons today over calls to scrap the two-child benefit cap.
The Prime Minister previously ruled out axing the policy, which limits the amount of benefits people can claim if they have more than two children, citing funding issues.
An SNP amendment to the King's Speech was selected today calling for the policy to be ditched, backed by a number of Labour MPs and lumping pressure on the new UK Government.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Keir Starmer needs to 'change' position on abhorrent two-child cap
Here is a (growing) list of Labour MPs who have previously spoken out against the two-child benefit cap:
- Rosie Duffield (Labour MP for Canterbury) said in a Sunday Times column that the two-child benefit cap amounts to “social cleansing” and is an “anti-feminist and unequal piece of legislation”.
- Helen Hayes (Labour MP for Dulwich and West Norwood) also spoke out against the policy in a Commons debate, saying: “The child poverty taskforce and the government must follow the evidence including from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the Trussell Trust and a wide range of experts showing a clear correlation between the two-child cap on benefits and increased child poverty. I hope the government will consider this evidence.”
- Meg Hillier (Labour MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch) told the BBC’s Westminster Hour: “Well, I was never comfortable about having the child benefit cap come in. Personally, I’d be lobbying for a lifting of that.”
- Zarah Sultana (Labour MP for Coventry South) said in a Commons debate: “Everyone in this chamber knows the evidence is overwhelming. The single most effective way of tackling child poverty is immediately lifting 300,000 children out of it by scrapping this cruel policy.”
- John McDonnell (Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington and former shadow chancellor) tweeted: “It’s pretty clear that we now need an honest and fundamental discussion in the Labour party about child poverty, its causes and the impact of the policies introduced by the Tories, including the two-child limit, because it’s obvious some in the party don’t fully appreciate its impact.”
- Kim Johnson (Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside) said the “punitive policy needs to be consigned to the dustbin of history where it belongs”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel