THE new owners of a £25 million Scottish castle estate have hidden their identity through a legal loophole.
The Times reported that the purchaser of Dunbeath Castle, which is on the North Coast 500 (NC500) route south east of Wick, had remained anonymous thanks to the use of trusts and company filings.
Locals in the area reportedly believe that the estate, which encompasses some 28,500 acres, has been bought by a Texan billionaire, but no details have been made public.
The sprawling property also includes 21 additional houses, hunting grounds, four miles of coastline, and the Dunbeath Water river system.
READ MORE: Plans for holiday cabin complex in Scottish national park rejected by government
Property agent Savills confirmed the sale but gave no details of the buyer.
The previous owner, Stuart Wyndham Murray Threipland, was facing “severe financial pressure” and took his own life on the day the estate went on sale, an inquest at Wiltshire and Swindon Coroner's Court was told last July.
Threipland had been found dead at Wilton Estate in Wiltshire – which is owned by his stepson, William Herbert, "the 18th Earl of Pembroke".
The Dunbeath estate was marketed worldwide, with a video produced by a New York-based agent titled “INSIDE a $32,000,000 Castle for Sale in Scotland” being viewed more than 1.3 million times.
Around one year after it went on sale in June 2023, the sale was completed.
However, filings on Scotland’s land registry show the purchaser as Dunbeath Estates Limited, The Times reported.
Dunbeath Estates Limited was incorporated on April 5, 2024, according to Companies House, and gives a registered address as “c/o Turcan Connell Princes Exchange, 1 Earl Grey Street, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH3 9EE”.
Under “persons with significant control”, Companies House lists “Tc Trustees Limited”, which is based at the same Edinburgh address.
This trust has no controlling persons listed, with Companies House stating: “The company knows or has reasonable cause to believe that there is no registrable person or registrable relevant legal entity in relation to the company.”
Land reform campaigner and former MSP Andy Wightman told The Times that people can “get around” UK transparency laws “by making the owner a UK company with a trustee company as a sole shareholder and there the trail ends cold”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel