A SCOTTISH Labour MP has claimed that tackling child poverty is in the party’s “DNA” – despite voting to keep the two-child benefit cap.
Former director of the Better Together campaign and MP for East Renfrewshire Blair McDougall appeared on the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Wednesday.
It comes after Keir Starmer (below) suspended seven Labour MPs for backing an SNP amendment to scrap the two-child benefit cap limit as Stephen Flynn said the UK Government “must take ownership of the damage it is causing”.
Asked if he was “embarrassed voting to condemn children to poverty” by host Gary Robertson, McDougall replied that MPs had voted for a King’s Speech which would do an “enormous amount” to help those living in poverty.
“We voted against an amendment that criticised the Government for not having lifted the two-child cap after just 18 days,” he said.
“We were always clear that this is something that we want to do, lifting kids out of poverty is what Labour governments do. It’s in our DNA.
READ MORE: Royal family annual income to rise by £45 MILLION
“But we were also very clear in the election and very clear last night that that has to be paid for somehow and we know that the public finances are an absolute mess, that’s what we’ve been left by the Tories.”
He added that scrapping the cap was therefore a question about public finances before Labour could start to do the things they would like, including lifting the two-child cap.
Starmer had come under increasing pressure to scrap the Tory measure with former prime minister Gordon Brown among those to hit out at the “inequities” of the policy.
McDougall continued to say that everyone in Labour wanted to lift the cap but refused to put a timeframe on when this might happen.
He said: “The King’s Speech contained measures to, for example, raise the minimum wage to the level of the living wage to deal with exploitative employment practices like zero-hours contracts, to deal with fuel poverty.
“And so there’s a huge amount in there about getting on with the job of lifting kids out of poverty immediately.
“As I say the question of the two-child cap is one of affordability. I think everybody in the Labour Party is making the same argument which is that this is something that we want to do but you know we’re not sitting about in the meantime.”
McDougall was then pressed on whether or not he would vote in line with Scottish Labour’s policies, given that Anas Sarwar has previously called for the cap to be ditched.
The MP replied that “everybody in Scottish Labour supports getting rid of the two-child cap” and again pointed to the question of the finances available.
READ MORE: How did Scottish Labour MPs vote on two-child benefit cap?
Asked explicitly if he would vote based on Scottish Labour policy or UK Labour, he said he did not think there was a difference in policy north and south of the Border and claimed the position on the issue was “identical”.
He further added however that Labour need to be a “little bit more ambitious when it comes to child poverty”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel