STEPHEN Flynn has written to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband asking for clarity on the timescales for the funding of the Acorn carbon capture project in north east Scotland.
The SNP’s Westminster leader said a lack of certainty on funding and licensing is holding back the scheme, which is based at St Fergus near Peterhead, Aberdeenshire.
The UK Government confirmed the project would progress to its “track two” stage last year.
READ MORE: Council leaders to ask Scottish Government for more money to avoid bin strikes
The project is working with industrial, power, hydrogen, bioenergy and waste-to-energy businesses, including those in Peterhead; Grangemouth, near Falkirk; and Mossmorran, near Cowdenbeath, Fife; which wish to capture CO2 emissions and send them into permanent geological storage under the North Sea.
First Minister John Swinney visited the site earlier this week and pledged £2 million in funding from the Scottish Government.
He said the UK Government must make “crucial decisions” about it.
Flynn (below) said: “With seven prime ministers having now come and gone, we frustratingly remain in a position where there is no certainty over the timeline for licensing, nor the delivery of funding, for this crucial project.
“This is clearly a matter of profound urgency and in both industry, and the Scottish Government, the new UK Government has partners who are desperate to see this project grow and deliver.
“Carbon capture is an essential component of our journey to both net zero and the creation of new high-skilled jobs – and I will continue to seek both clarity and certainty from the new Secretary of State as we seek to deliver on these shared ambitions.”
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said carbon capture is key to the Government’s plans to make the UK a “clean energy superpower” and £1 billion has been committed to its deployment.
READ MORE: Police issue statement after shocking video shows officer 'kicking' man in the head
A spokeswoman said: “We are taking immediate action to implement our plan for clean power by 2030, while continuing to develop cutting-edge technologies like carbon capture, usage and storage.
“This technology is vital to boost our energy independence and the Climate Change Committee describe it as a necessity, not an option, for reaching our climate goals.
“The initial cluster projects are nearing the first financial investment decisions this year, which are expected to create jobs and bring in billions of public and private investment into our industrial heartlands.”
However, an environmental campaign group said politicians are wrong to put so much faith in carbon capture schemes.
Friends of the Earth Scotland just transition campaigner Rosie Hampton said: “Yet again politicians are pleading on behalf of rich fossil fuel polluters for more public money to be poured into the Acorn carbon capture project.
“Carbon capture has already had billions of pounds and decades of work to prove itself and it has failed on its promises everywhere it has been tried.
“Carbon capture is designed to greenwash the expansion of fossil fuels and the polluter’s pipe dream of Acorn project will never live up to its hype.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel