A LABOUR rebel has said that the party’s duty of care is “severely lacking” after being handed six-month suspension from the party.
Zarah Sultana was one of seven – alongside former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, ex-shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey, Apsana Begum, Richard Burgon, Ian Byrne and Imran Hussain – who were kicked out of the Parliamentary Labour Party on Tuesday night after voting for an SNP amendment to the King’s Speech calling for the two-child benefit cap to be axed.
The now Independent MP for Coventry South told the News Agents podcast on Wednesday evening that neither the Labour whip’s office nor the leadership office had spoken with her since.
READ MORE: Labour MP says ending two-child cap 'matter of political will' amid growing rebellion
“[This] speaks to a wider culture around duty of care, which I feel is severely lacking,” Sultana said.
She also told the podcast that Labour whips refused to give her a bigger office she could pray in.
Sultana previously suggested she was the victim of a “macho virility test” and said she “slept well knowing that I took a stand against child poverty”.
Asked for her view of Prime Minister Keir Starmer following the action, she also told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I’m not interested in playing up to this macho virility test that seems to be what people are talking about.
“It’s about the material conditions of 330,000 children living in poverty.
“This isn’t a game. This is about people’s lives.”
Although the rebellion was small and the motion comfortably defeated by the Government, opposition to the cap within Labour is not limited to the seven who lost the whip.
Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson said she had voted with the Government “for unity” but warned that the strength of feeling within the party is “undeniable”.
“We moved the dial, the campaign will continue,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel