Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said at PMQs this week that since the SNP came to power in Holyrood, the number of children in poverty has increased in Scotland.
“Since the SNP came to power, there are 30,000 more children in poverty in Scotland,” Starmer told the House on July 24.
READ MORE: PMQs: Stephen Flynn told off for breaking Commons rule
Evaluation
By one measure of child poverty Starmer is correct, but by other commonly used measures he is wrong.
The facts
There are different ways of measuring poverty. The Scottish Government tracks both absolute and relative poverty, and it records these figures both before and after housing costs are taken into account.
A household is counted as being in absolute poverty if it makes less than 60% of the median income in the country as measured in the year ending March 2011 and adjusted for inflation. Relative poverty is less than 60% of the contemporary median income in any year considered.
The SNP have been in power in Holyrood since May 2007.
In the year ending March 2023, the latest for which data is available, the number of children in relative poverty before housing costs was 240,000.
That is an increase of 30,000 from the year ending March 2007, the year before the SNP took charge.
However, by other measures the level of change in child poverty has been different.
READ MORE: Spain's richest man looks to buy 'landmark' building in Scottish city
The number of children in relative poverty after housing costs increased by a smaller amount than Starmer claimed – by 10,000 to 260,000 between March 2007 and March 2023.
The levels according to the absolute poverty measure are down 20,000 both before and after housing costs to 190,000 and 230,000 respectively.
Starmer also did not mention the Scottish Child Payment, a weekly payment of £26.70 introduced by the SNP, provided to lower income families for each child in their care.
Professor Danny Dorling of Oxford University has said that the payment may have caused the largest fall in child poverty anywhere in Europe since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel