A SUSPENDED Labour MP has claimed that party whips threatened to withdraw her “domestic abuse support” if she voted in favour of lifting the two-child benefit cap.
Apsana Begum (below), who was among six other Labour MPs suspended for supporting an SNP amendment on the issue, made the claim to various outlets including Times Radio, where she said that she was told before the vote that “support for me as a survivor of domestic abuse was contingent on how I was voting”.
She added: “I've just had to run in an election in which my ex-husband was standing against me, and feeling like my experiences were being weaponised against me in this situation during the whipping operation was absolutely shocking and the fact that supporting me regarding my ex-husband was discussed in this context is completely unacceptable.”
Begum has previously been outspoken about her experiences with alleged domestic abuse.
Speaking in a Westminster Hall debate in 2022, she told MPs she had been in a marriage to a man which had become "volatile and abusive" and that he had continued to harass her after the relationship ended – allegations which have not been proven in court.
READ MORE: 'Fracturing': Scottish Labour councillor calls his own MP a liar over two-child cap
Begum is also a campaigner on the issue and is the chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Domestic Violence and Abuse.
Her ex-husband Ehtasham Haque has called the domestic abuse claims "false and defamatory".
"I completely deny that at any stage I behaved inappropriately towards Apsana Begum during our marriage," he said.
Journalist and The National columnist Owen Jones (below) named Labour MP Anna McMorrin in a thread on Twitter/X as the assistant government whip who spoke to Begum – claiming the information came from two separate MPs.
Jones wrote: “It is reported that, on the day of the vote on the two child benefits limit, Apsana Begum mentioned to McMorrin that the General Election campaign was difficult.
“It is also reported that the general election campaign was difficult because her ex-husband was standing against her.”
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Keir Starmer's SNP child poverty claim
He added: “McMorrin then reportedly said that in order to be supported, Begum needed to be a Labour MP – that is, not defy the Whip over the two child limit vote, and thus lose the Whip.
“It is also reported that Apsana told colleagues afterwards that she was shaken, and felt her request to not talk about this issue in this way was not respectful, and the whole thing had been wholly inappropriate.”
Members of the House of Commons voted 363 to 103, majority 260, to reject the two-child benefit cap amendment tabled in the name of SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn.
The cap, introduced in 2015 by then-Conservative chancellor George Osborne, restricts child welfare payments to the first two children born to most families.
More than 40 Labour MPs recorded no vote, with some of those listed spotted in the chamber throughout the day, while others will have had permission to miss the vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel