THE Scottish Government has said it is “deeply disappointing” that it was not consulted before Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a slew of cuts in a bid to tackle a £22 billion black hole in public finances.
Amongst the cuts, the Chancellor confirmed the Winter Fuel Payment will be scrapped for those not in receipt of benefits.
The decision is expected to affect millions of people, with questions raised about the impact it will have in Scotland.
READ MORE: 'Utterly unjustifiable': Economist reacts to Rachel Reeves speech
The Scottish Government is taking over responsibility for the Winter Fuel Payment and is introducing the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment, which is expected to be in place by this winter.
Once the responsibility has been transferred, the UK Government will provide a Block Grant Adjustment for the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment.
However, it is understood that the scrapping of the Winter Fuel Payment will “reduce the funding given” for the Scottish equivalent.
Whilst the full implications of the Chancellor’s statement are still being examined by the Scottish Government, a spokesperson told The National that it is “deeply disappointing” there was no discussion between the two governments ahead of the announcement.
READ MORE: Main points as Labour announce billions of spending cuts in 'new era of austerity'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Responsibility for Winter Fuel Payment will be transferred to the Scottish Government this winter (2024-25), with these payments funded from within the 2024-25 Scottish Budget.
“The full implications of the Chancellor’s statement are being examined, however it’s understood means-testing Winter Fuel Payments will reduce the funding given to the Scottish Government associated with our planned replacement Pension Age Winter Heating Payment.
“That such a change can be made without any consultation or discussion with the Scottish Government Ministers is deeply disappointing given both governments committed to resetting the relationship between them.
“The Scottish Government is committed to tackling fuel poverty and has consistently supported vulnerable households through a range of actions.
“We are keen to develop an understanding of the UK Government’s wider plans to protect energy customers in greatest need, such as a social energy tariff.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel