AN increase to the windfall tax on oil and gas profits will have a “hugely detrimental” effect on the industry, an MSP has claimed, as he invited the Chancellor to Aberdeen to “reflect” on her decision.
Rachel Reeves announced in a late-afternoon policy paper on Monday that she would be raising the Energy Profit Levy from 35% to 38%, taking the headline tax rate for the sector to 78% from November 1.
The shock announcement came without warning after the Chancellor’s fiscal statement in the Commons.
Reeves also confirmed an extension to the levy by one year to March 31, 2030 – the end of the financial year in which the current Parliament is due to finish – and have its investment allowances tightened.
READ MORE: Winter Fuel Payment: Scottish Government not consulted on welfare cut
The Energy Profits Levy is the tax on the extraordinary profits of oil and gas companies operating in the UK and the UK Continental Shelf and was introduced in May 2022. It was increased by Jeremy Hunt in January last year who also announced it would remain in place until 2029.
Aberdeen Central MSP Kevin Stewart (below) has insisted the Chancellor’s latest move will severely damage the oil and gas industry and he has written a letter inviting her to the north east city to speak with workers “whose jobs are being put at risk” by the hike.
He claimed the increase to the tax would put the just transition to renewables at risk and lead to extensive job losses.
Stewart said: “I’m extremely concerned the Chancellor has chosen to raise and extend the Energy Profits Levy in her statement to Parliament.
“This decision will have a hugely detrimental impact on the oil and gas industry, puts the just transition at risk, and will lead to countless thousands of job losses.
“The industry, trade unions and workers have all warned of the hardship of the calamity and the destruction this decision will cause and it is galling this announcement has been made without meaningful engagement with the sector, unions and the communities of the north east of Scotland.
READ MORE: Scottish Government 'will need to find £100m to mitigate Labour cuts'
“The Chancellor needs to hear these views firsthand and I’m inviting her to Aberdeen where I’m willing to host a public meeting so she can hear for herself the views of industry, the community, and most importantly the workers whose jobs are being put at risk.
“I’m sure their insight will allow her the opportunity to reflect, reevaluate and reconsider the decision she has made.”
In his letter, Stewart pointed to the Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce having warned that the Chancellor will risk losing £20 billion in revenues for the Treasury because of the decision.
David Whitehouse, the chief executive of trade association Offshore Energies UK, said the announcement had been made without meaningful engagement with the sector.
“This is not partnership working between government and industry,” he said.
“We recognise the Government has significant spending challenges to manage but today’s announcement will only serve to rock confidence further.
“The offshore energy sector supports over 200,000 jobs. These are real people, working in our energy industry today. Today’s announcement jeopardises jobs in communities across the UK.”
The announcement came after Reeves said she had uncovered a £22 billion black hole in the public finances.
She said she had made “tough decisions” based on the position, which also included announcing that from this autumn, pensioners in England and Wales not on pension credit or other means-tested benefits will no longer get winter fuel payments worth between £100 and £300.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray has since claimed it is “completely wrong” to say that Labour politicians knew public spending cuts would be needed prior to the election.
He claimed the black hole had been "hidden" by the Conservatives, but Labour is continuing to come under fire after repeatedly pledging before the General Election that there would be "no austerity" under the party.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel