WAITING times at Scotland’s emergency departments have improved sharply, new figures have shown.
Statistics released on Tuesday by Public Health Scotland (PHS) show 68% of attendances in the week up to July 28 were seen within four hours.
Despite falling well short of the 95% target set by the Scottish Government – meaning almost one third are still waiting too long – the figure increased from 63.5% the previous week.
READ MORE: Scotland performed better on A&E waits than England and Wales over past decade
The proportion of people waiting longer than 12 hours also dropped between the two weeks, falling from 5.6% to 5%.
The proportion of those waiting more than eight hours also dropped from 12.9% to 10.8%.
But the latest monthly figures, also released on Tuesday, showed a drop in performance in June.
Those seen within four hours dropped from 70.8% to 69%, while the number of people waiting more than 12 hours increased from 4.2% to 4.5%.
Those waiting eight hours or more jumped from 10% to 10.7%.
Health Secretary Neil Gray (above) said: “The latest weekly figures which show performance is moving in the right direction, with over two thirds of people being seen in our emergency departments within four hours.
“Although we have the best performing core A&E departments in the UK, performance remains below the level we all wish to see.
“We are continuing to work with Boards to reduce long waits and support delivery of sustained improvements.
“Services are facing sustained pressure and this is not unique to Scotland – with similar challenges being felt right across the UK.
“This year’s Scottish Budget provides more than £19.5 billion for health and social care and an extra £500 million for frontline boards.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel