HUMZA Yousaf’s in-laws, who were trapped in Gaza during the early days of Israel’s siege of the region, are preparing eyewitness testimony to deliver to the International Criminal Court (ICC) amid a war crimes investigation.
The former first minister told a crowd at the Edinburgh Fringe that his mother- and father-in-law, Elizabeth and Maged El-Nakla, were not yet over their “extremely traumatising” experiences in Gaza after becoming trapped there following the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023.
The El-Naklas remained unable to leave Gaza for almost a month as Israel put the region under heavy siege, with military bombardments as well as cutting off water and power.
Speaking at an Iain Dale All Talk event in Edinburgh, which was being hosted by Matthew Stadlen, Yousaf was asked: “You had to endure a terrible time when your parents-in-law were stuck in Gaza. Are you healing from that horrific experience?”
The former SNP leader responded: “I am. I'm not sure they are, yet, if I’m frankly honest. My mother-in-law in particular still finds that experience extremely traumatising indeed. The things that they saw.”
He went on: “They are compiling evidence for the International Criminal Court. They [the ICC] want eyewitness accounts of what’s happening in Gaza, so we are in the midst of doing that.
READ MORE: Alison Phipps: ICJ's genocide ruling marks end of Israel’s impunity
“The things that they saw will live with them until their dying breath. My mother-in-law tells me of hearing a blast nearby. They thought the house had been hit. They went outside and lying in their front garden was an eight-year-old girl with a broken spine who'd been near the blast.
“I don’t know how many feet she’d travelled in the air to be lying in their front garden with a broken spine. She couldn't move her legs. The things they've seen and endured will live with them for their whole lives.”
Speaking to The National afterwards, Yousaf said that he had been “in touch with the ICC” and the evidence from his in-laws would be delivered “in due course, because it will no doubt help them determine whether or not war crimes have been committed”.
The ICC’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, announced in May that he was seeking an arrest warrant for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes, as well as Israel defence minister Yoav Gallant and several Hamas leaders.
Khan, who was sworn in for a nine-year term as the chief prosecutor in June 2021, said he believes the Israeli prime minister to be responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip and Israel.
A panel of judges on the ICC are still considering whether to grant the warrant. If they do so, it will be the duty of nations who are signed up to the ICC, such as the UK, to detain Netanyahu if he sets foot on their soil.
READ MORE: Israel ordered to prevent genocide in Gaza by UN's top court
A Panel of Experts in International Law, convened by Khan to support his investigation into the “situation in the state of Palestine”, unanimously endorsed that there were “reasonable grounds to believe” that individuals named in the arrest warrants have committed war crimes or crimes against humanity within the court’s jurisdiction.
In a piece for the Financial Times, the group said: "We hope that the prosecutor will continue to conduct focused investigations including in relation to the extensive harm suffered by civilians as a result of the bombing campaign in Gaza and evidence of sexual violence committed against Israelis on October 7."
Israel is also facing a case in front of the the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over its actions in Palestine and whether they amount to genocide.
In July, the ICJ ruled that Israel’s presence in the Palestinian occupied territories is “unlawful” and called on it to end.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel