THE MP who unseated a top Labour figure has suggested the possibility of a new formal grouping of pro-Palestine independents being established in Parliament.
Shockat Adam, the MP for Leicester South, unseated Labour’s Jonathan Ashworth in last month’s General Election.
In an interview with The House magazine, he said “all options are open” when asked whether newly-elected independent MPs could come together in a formal grouping.
READ MORE: English riots gave me 'flashbacks' to being hunted by trafficking gang, says refugee in Scotland
Adam said: “I had never met any of these individuals before. Like myself, I don’t think they’d heard of me, and I don’t know all of them either. So we’re just getting to know each other.
“We have commonalities, especially on our foreign policies, etc, but we’re just navigating where we are politically on lots of things.
“We are working together on issues that we have common ground on.”
Adam’s election was considered a major upset for Labour as Ashworth (above) was shadow paymaster general at the time and had taken a leading role in the party’s campaign.
Following the election, seven Labour MPs were suspended from the party for defying the whip and backing an SNP amendment calling for an immediate end to the two-child cap.
The five independent MPs elected in July – Adam, Jeremy Corbyn, Ayoub Khan, Adnan Hussain and Iqbal Mohamed – reacted by writing to the seven MPs, thanking them for their vote.
The letter said the independents would “look forward to working closely” with the suspended MPs.
However, in his interview with The House, Adam said he was “not at all” working with the newly suspended MPs.
Asked whether he would like to see the seven MPs remain independents beyond their six-month suspensions, the MP described it as a “fluid situation”.
“All of them have incredible political history behind them. They bring a wealth of talent and skill sets with them, but I think that is something that you would need to ask them,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here