THE Scottish Government’s tree-planting agency has decided to press ahead with plans for a controversial beaver release in a community torn apart by the proposal.
After public consultations lasting two years, Forestry and Land Scotland (FLS) intends to apply this autumn for a licence to introduce beavers – which can damage trees and cause flooding – into Glen Affric.
If the application is allowed by Government wildlife agency NatureScot, the beaver introduction will be a major development in the animals’ spread.
It will be only the second in the Highlands outside their existing ranges around Tayside and in Argyll, the first north of the Great Glen, and the first by FLS, which will be working in partnership with conservation charity Trees for Life (TfL).
Although a majority of people in the local community, centred around the village of Cannich, have said they are happy about the reintroduction, most local farmers are firmly opposed, with one calling the decision to go ahead “totally unacceptable.”
Feelings have been running high in the Strathglass area since the proposals were mooted two years ago.
READ MORE: Fire breaks out on roof after family home in Aviemore struck by lightning
The conflict came to a head earlier this year when one angry landowner opposed to the beaver release had to be asked to leave a consultation session about the proposal.
Local people who favour the beaver release told the consultation team they are scared of speaking up because of landowner opposition.
Conservationists push for beaver introduction because the animals create biodiverse wetlands and mitigate downstream flooding with their dams.
TfL owns the Dundreggan estate not far from Glen Affric and has a 500-square-mile rewilding plan, the Affric Highlands project.
It will employ a beaver officer to monitor the animals and deal with any problems if the release goes ahead.
After an initial public consultation, the proposal has been scaled down and a fresh consultation this year found the majority of local people were in favour of the proposal for beaver release near Loch Beinn a’ Mheadhoin, five miles upstream from Cannich.
FLS has now said it is looking to make a licence application this autumn, with a potential release next spring.
The agency added: “This will only happen once we have mitigated the concerns that have been raised through our consultation process.”
Mitigation is intended to lessen any negative impacts of beavers and can include providing support to farmers facing beaver-dam floods, and monitoring where the animals go.
READ MORE: Glasgow 'could host next Commonwealth Games' with announcement 'due shortly'
But Karl Falconer, who farms 60 acres near Cannich said there were no mitigation measures that would make beavers acceptable in Glen Affric, with 40 local farmers against the proposal.
He said erosion on the River Glass was already a problem because of rapid fluctuations in water levels, caused by the hydro-electricity upstream dam on Loch Beinn a’ Mheadhoin.
Beavers digging into the banks would make matters worse: “They are beautiful creatures, and I’m for the reintroduction in the right places, but not in Strathglass. Our views are being ignored.”
Local farmer Sheena Thomson, who has 500 acres of valley-bottom land in Strathglass and farms ground four miles from the planned release site, said the consultations had been biased in favour of the beavers, failing to properly describe possible beaver damage.
She plans to object to the licence application, fearing beavers will travel downstream and damage the banks that protect her fields from flooding, meaning hay, silage and grazing will be lost.
“Since day one, they just haven’t listened,” she said.
READ MORE: Rescue teams save father and son from heat exhaustion on Scottish hillside
“All the local farmers area against this. We are the people who will have to bear the cost of flooding, in lost productivity, and we feel our views should have more weight than people who don’t have a stake.
“There is no compensation to the landowner or farmer to cover the cost of any productive land being flooded or lost into the river.
“This is totally unacceptable: the introduction of beavers should not be to the detriment of existing businesses.
“The solid wall of objection from the vast majority of farmers and landowners in Strathglass could not be clearer, but sadly FLS has decided not to listen and to push on with the proposal regardless.”
Steve Micklewright, chief executive of TfL, said: “It’s been inspiring to see so many local people engage so enthusiastically with our Glen Affric beaver proposals.
“A licence application from FLS to NatureScot for the reintroduction of these remarkable animals would be a hugely positive step forwards for nature, climate and people.”
Since 2021 Scottish Government policy has been to encourage the release of beavers, including by Government agencies such as FLS, and to allow releases all over the country.
Beaver reintroduction was high priority for Green party ministers during their now-ended spell in Government alongside the SNP.
Green Highlands and Islands MSP Ariane Burgess (above) said : “I am delighted that Forestry and Land Scotland are progressing with proposals to release beavers … I congratulate those involved in this project for making space for beavers to help nature thrive.”
So far only one translocation of the animals outside their existing range has taken place, in upper Speyside, by the Cairngorms National Park Authority. The authority said this week two beaver kits had just been born on the Spey.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel