JOHN Swinney has accused tech billionaire Elon Musk of “reprehensible” and “baseless” language aimed towards former first minister Humza Yousaf.
Musk, the alt-right owner of Twitter/X, previously said “civil war” is inevitable in the UK following far-right riots in England and Northern Ireland.
Yousaf’s legal team has issued a warning to Musk after he called the SNP MSP “super, super racist”.
READ MORE: The full timeline of Elon Musk vs Humza Yousaf
In a post on his own Twitter/X account, Musk said “legal discovery will show that however big a racist he’s been in public communications, he is vastly worse in private communications”.
Yousaf (below) previously called Musk a “dangerous race baiter” and “one of the most dangerous men on the planet”, accusing him of "amplifying white supremacy”.
Swinney said the language used by Musk “tells us all we need to know” about the way in which X, formerly Twitter, is “being used as a platform for the fermenting of hate in our society”.
Speaking to the media on Monday, the First Minister said: “I think the language that Elon Musk has used is not only reprehensible, it’s baseless.
“It tells us all we need to know about the degree to which the platform which Elon Musk owns is being used as a platform for the fermenting of hate in our society.
READ MORE: Support for Humza Yousaf amid clash with Twitter owner Elon Musk
“Ofcom reminded social media companies of their obligations to take their material that incites hatred or racism or violence – and that’s not been followed by X.
“The comments by Elon Musk perhaps evidence why that’s been the case.”
Swinney added that he wanted to make sure social media companies are held to account so that they are unable to “propagate the tension and hatred” which has stoked far-right disorder across England and Northern Ireland in recent days.
He continued: “I think in all of this issue, which causes me a huge amount of anxiety and unease about violence within our community – thankfully we’ve been protected from that so far in Scotland.
“But I want to make sure that people like Elon Musk are held to account and aren’t able to propagate the tension and hatred which has been part of our lives for far too long.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel