CONCERNS have been raised that Twitter/X owner Elon Musk may have access to users’ direct messages – after a claim he made about Humza Yousaf’s “private communications”.
The social media boss and entrepreneur is engaged in a ferocious war of words with the former first minister, with Yousaf suggesting he may sue Musk after being branded “super, super racist”.
In response to a tweet sharing a news article about the pair’s online dispute, Musk said: “I dare that scumbag [Yousaf] to sue me. Go ahead, make my day…”
But in a comment which has been seized on by Twitter/X users concerned about their privacy on the platform, Musk added: “Legal discovery will show that however big a racist he’s been in public communications, he is vastly worse in private communications.”
READ MORE: Elon Musk labels Humza Yousaf a 'scumbag' in response to legal warning
Legal discovery refers to the process where parties in a dispute can obtain evidence from the other.
Parties can be compelled to comply with requests for information, though were Yousaf (above) to bring a defamation case against Musk it is unclear whether the SNP MSP would be required to hand over his own private communications.
According to US legal website Lexology, in most American courts it is the person making accusations of defamation that must prove they are being defamed, meaning the burden of proof in this situation would fall on Yousaf.
What does Twitter/X say?
According to Twitter/X’s online help centre the company is “not quite there yet” in terms of where it aims to be on the privacy of direct messages, sometimes known as DMs.
The website said: “X seeks to be the most trusted platform on the internet, and encrypted direct messages are an important part of that. As Elon Musk said, when it comes to direct messages, the standard should be, if someone puts a gun to our heads, we still can’t access your messages.
READ MORE: John Swinney hits back at Elon Musk after Humza Yousaf attack
“We’re not quite there yet, but we’re working on it.”
The company has unveiled plans for encrypted messages, which will meet the highest standards of online privacy – but are only available to “verified users” or accounts linked to a “verified organisation”.
Twitter/X users responded to Musk’s tweet, voicing concern about the privacy of their messages.
One said: “Remember, your private messages are not actually private.”
Another added: “Elon grassing on himself that he sneaks [through] people’s private conversations.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel