HUMZA Yousaf has hit out at the “dehumanisation of refugees” as new polling showed over a third of people in the UK believe “attacks against refugee homes are necessary”.
Polling company WeThink interviewed 1278 people across the UK to discover their thoughts on far-right riots in England and Northern Ireland.
The responses found that 39% of people believed “hostility against refugees is sometimes justified”.
National contributor Owen Jones reacted to the findings by saying “a third of Britons are violent racists – that’s what this poll says”.
Participants were asked to respond to a series of statements on refugees and whether or not they agreed or disagreed. Below is a look at some of the key results.
- Overall, 39% of people said they agreed that “when it comes to the refugee problem, violence is sometimes the only means that citizens have to get the attention of British politicians”
- Figures showed 34% of people agreed that attacks against refugee homes are sometimes necessary to make it clear to politicians that we have a refugee problem
- Furthermore, 32% agreed that “hostility against refugees is sometimes justified, even if it ends up in violence”
- And 36% said they agreed that “xenophobic acts of violence are defensible if they result in fewer refugees being settled in your town”
Former first minister Humza Yousaf was among those to react to the poll, saying: “Over a third polled believe that xenophobic acts of violence are defensible if they result in fewer refugees settling in their town.
“Decades of institutional xenophobia in our media & politics have led to the absolute dehumanisation of refugees.
“What have we become? For shame.”
READ MORE: Support for Humza Yousaf amid clash with Twitter owner Elon Musk
WeThink also asked those polled what they felt were the main cause of recent far-right violence in England and Northern Ireland.
Statistics showed 54% said immigration, while 52% said racism and 40% believed it was because of “violence for its own sake”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel