THE Scottish Government will make sure public services “don't crumble away”, the Finance Secretary has said as she raised the prospect of major cuts amid Labour's “austerity” agenda.
Shona Robison suggested that the SNP government would be forced to consider options such as reducing the “size of the public sector” through amalgamations, office changes, and potentially voluntary redundancies.
Robison was at Edinburgh Napier University to discuss the impact of the annual GERS figures, which were published on Wednesday and showed a notional Scottish deficit of £22.7 billion – the gap between what is spent for Scotland and the tax receipts from Scotland.
The Finance Secretary said that the notional deficit was largely due to the impact of UK Government decisions as she raised the prospect of major public sector cuts.
READ MORE: What is the GERS report and how is it calculated?
Robison said: “We do have tough decisions to make, and we need to make sure that our public finances, we tackle the in-year pressure that is here due to the Chancellor's statement, that will have a tail that will impact for the foreseeable future.”
In late July, Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves unveiled a package of spending cuts to make up for what she claimed was an unforeseen £22bn shortfall in public finances.
Among the cuts, the Winter Fuel Payment was made means-tested in a widely criticised move that the Scottish Government said on Wednesday that it had “no choice” but to follow.
Speaking to media, Robison suggested more cuts would have to be made.
Asked about public services, she said: “We'll make sure they don't crumble away. Our priority is clear around making sure we sustain public services, that we can continue to tackle poverty, and that we continue to invest in net zero and transforming our economy.
“Those are the key priorities. But it will have an impact, and we will have to decide what we deprioritise and that work is ongoing.”
Robison added that there “are challenges that we will need to address in terms of what the size of the public sector is going forward and to make sure that we can ensure it's sustainable and affordable, so there are absolutely tough decisions”.
Asked if changes to the size of the public sector would mean cuts to jobs or redundancies, Robison said: “There is inextricably a link between headcount and pay. Now we will have to work through that and we want to be absolutely fair to the public sector.
“We value our public sector workforce, and we want to work with them in making sure that going forward, we get to have a sustainable position, but that we take our workforce with us.”
READ MORE: Seamus Logan: Catalonia shows there is no quick wheeze to indy
Pushed on whether the public sector can expect to see redundancies between now and 2026, the Finance Secretary said: “We are putting in emergency controls and strict controls … for the foreseeable future, only recruitment in those absolutely critical areas like, for example, blue light services can go forward.
“So there is absolutely going to be a restraint on any recruitment.”
She added: “We obviously have a position of no compulsory redundancy, so we will want to work with the workforce around what voluntary measures can be taken.”
Robison highlighted how First Minister John Swinney and the Institute for Fiscal Studies had “warned during the election campaign that austerity was going to be ushered in … And here we are”.
However, she wouldn’t be drawn on specific cuts that may need to be made, saying: “We want to set that out all in the round, and we will. We'll be fully transparent about that.
“We'll set out all of the detail when we come back to parliament. There will be a fiscal statement, and I will set out all of the detail that will be required to be known by parliament. But it's going be tough.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel