IF you’re an MSP who is about to criticise your closest political allies, make sure you’re doing it in private.
That is a key lesson which Tory MSP Stephen Kerr needs to learn after an almighty blunder saw him publicly call Murdo Fraser’s leadership campaign “awful”.
Kerr apparently believed he was sending private messages to a “close friend”, but was in fact posting his comments as WhatsApp statuses, allowing everyone in his contact book to see them.
Not only did Kerr call Fraser’s campaign “awful” – he then backed it. What does that say about the other five contenders?
An amazing story which we need to talk about.
— Laura Webster (@LauraEWebsterr) August 14, 2024
Stephen Kerr's WhatsApps slagging off his ally Murdo Fraser's leadership campaign were leaked. It turned out that he was posting statuses rather than private messages. Meaning all of his contacts saw this: pic.twitter.com/QiZcQB0kqp
But apparently Kerr has had some regrets.
“I’m beginning to wish I’d nominated Meghan,” he said in one status, a reference to the Meghan Gallacher standing against Fraser to become Scottish Tory leader.
And Graham Simpson was also in the firing line, as Kerr confided in literally everyone that his MSP colleague “knows zilch about working with councillors”.
Kerr’s unfortunate WhatsApp statuses sparked hilarity online, with Politico’s Bethany Dawson writing: “I think I’d simply change my name and move countries.”
READ MORE: Stephen Kerr 'loses the rag' with hustings audience for 'staring at me'
"This is one of the funniest political stories i've ever seen," a second user wrote.
“Today is the day I found out you can do status updates on WhatsApp,” another added, apparently offering Kerr some semblance of sympathy.
Others shared an image memorably tweeted by the Scottish Parliament back in 2022 which appeared to label Kerr “potato with more vitamin C than a lemon”.
It's never a bad time to be reminded of that.
.@jameshuttoninst predict that gene-editing technology could result in potatoes with more vitamin C than lemons being grown.@realstephenkerr's Members' Business debate will focus on gene-modification and gene-editing this afternoon. Watch here: https://t.co/FA6JAJbAwT pic.twitter.com/tuHlDsCxaV
— Scottish Parliament (@ScotParl) November 8, 2022
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel