JOHN Swinney confronted Angela Rayner over Labour’s cuts to pensioner benefits during a meeting in Edinburgh.
The First Minister challenged Keir Starmer’s deputy on the decision to remove Winter Fuel Payments for millions of pensioners.
The change, which means now only the poorest pensioners will be entitled to money from the Government towards their energy bills, is expected to affect tens of thousands of Scots.
During a meeting in Bute House on Thursday, Swinney told the Deputy Prime Minister of his “concern” at the change, which he said was done without consulting the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: Scottish Government not consulted on Winter Fuel Payment
In a statement following the talks, Swinney (below) said: “I expressed concern at the UK Government’s decision to cut spending for the Winter Fuel Payment for pensioners without any consultation with the Scottish Government.
“Scotland faces the most challenging financial circumstances in the devolution era and has no alternative but to replicate this decision which will impact tens of thousands of pensioners in Scotland.
“As I have previously warned, we need an injection of investment in our public services to deal with rising pressures and the ongoing cost of austerity.”
READ MORE: Universal Winter Fuel Payments to be axed in Scotland – find out if you're affected
The pair also discussed recent far-right riots across England and Northern Ireland and the First Minister stressed he was “building a constructive and collaborative relationship with the UK Government that delivers for the people of Scotland”.
He added: “In that spirit of cooperation, I was pleased to welcome the Deputy Prime Minister to Bute House to discuss how our two governments can work together on shared priorities such as supporting strong public services and reaching net-zero.
“Following recent criminal disorder in England and Northern Ireland, both governments restated their duty to tackle hatred of any kind and agreed we have a responsibility to confront racism and religious prejudice wherever, and whenever, it appears – including on social media.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel