A SENIOR diplomat working at the Foreign Office has resigned after claiming that the department “may be complicit in war crimes” over the continued sale of arms to Israel.
Mark Smith, a diplomat at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), resigned from his post on Friday, raising concerns about the UK’s complicity in Israel’s war in Gaza, which has so far killed more than 40,000 Palestinians.
“It is with sadness that I resign after a long career in the diplomatic service, however I can no longer carry out my duties in the knowledge that this department may be complicit in war crimes,” Smith wrote.
READ MORE: Owen Jones: Angus Robertson meeting lent legitimacy to state drenched in blood
He added that he was “a subject matter expert in the domain of armed sales policy”, having formerly worked on the arms exports licensing assessment in the Middle East and North Africa Department (MENAD).
Smith said: “Each day we witness clear and unquestionable examples of war crimes and breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza perpetrated by the State of Israel.
“Senior members of the Israeli government and military have expressed open genocidal intent, Israeli soldiers take videos, deliberately burning destroying, and looting civilian property and openly admit to the rape and torture of prisoners.
“Over half of Gaza’s homes and over 80% of commercial properties have been damaged or destroyed.
“Whole streets and universities have been demolished, humanitarian aid is being blocked and civilians are regularly left with no safe quarter to flee to.
“Red Crescent ambulances have been attacked, schools and hospitals are regularly targeted. These are war crimes.”
READ MORE: Anger at Edinburgh University principal meeting with Israel diplomat
Smith added that there is “no justification” for the UK’s continued arms sales to Israel.
It comes as the UK Government has reportedly put off a decision on suspending arms sales to Israel, whilst officials investigate exactly which exported weaponry could have been used and where in Israel.
Smith said he had raised his concerns at every level in the department, including through an official whistle blowing investigation, but “received nothing more than ‘thank you we have noted your concerns’”.
He added that ministers’ claims that the UK has one of the most “robust and transparent” arms export licensing regimes in the world were “the opposite of the truth”.
“As a fully cleared officer raising serious concerns of illegality in this department, to be disregarded in this way is deeply troubling," Smith said.
“It is my duty as a public servant to raise this.”
READ MORE: Israel meetings labelled 'utterly tone-deaf' as row continues amongst SNP members
Commenting on the resignation, Dr Ian Overton, executive director of Action on Armed Violence, said: “Mark Smith’s resignation is a profound indictment of the UK’s arms export policies.
“It takes immense courage to stand up against a system complicit in the suffering of civilians, and his actions should prompt a serious reevaluation of the ethical responsibilities that come with arms trading.”
Meanwhile, a spokesperson from pro-Palestine campaign Gaza Genocide Emergency Committee said: “An admirable resignation letter and damning indictment of the UK Government over its arms sales to Israel, complicity in war crimes and enabling of the genocide.
“A shining example of how others can follow him and be on the right side of history.”
A spokesperson for the FCDO said: "This government is committed to upholding international law. We have made clear that we will not export items if they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violations of international humanitarian law.
"There is an ongoing review process to assess whether Israel is complying with international humanitarian law, which the Foreign Secretary initiated on day one in office.
"We will provide an update as soon as that review process has been completed."
The spokesperson said the FCDO would not comment on individual cases.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel