FINANCE Secretary Shona Robison has blasted reports suggesting Labour could change the law to allow Scottish Secretary Ian Murray to bypass Holyrood and directly fund anti-poverty schemes.
The Sunday Mail has reported new legislation to expand the powers of the Scotland Office by turning it into a “spending department” is likely to be voted on by MPs around the time of the Budget on October 30.
It would allow Chancellor Rachel Reeves to allocate a reported £150 million to Murray for local authority measures to combat poverty.
However, Robison said such a move would be “out of kilter” with the “positive” relationship being built between the Scottish and UK Governments.
She has warned the Labour Government against a “continuation” of the Conservatives’ “bypassing of the Scottish Parliament”, as a source suggested Murray could do a “better job” than the “incompetent” Scottish Government.
READ MORE: Ex-MPs give verdict on what must be debated at SNP election review
Speaking on BBC Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme, Robison said the £150m could have been used to avoid means-testing the Winter Fuel Payment north of the border.
She added Murray would be bypassing Holyrood if the plan suggested by the newspaper went ahead.
“If that is new money, there is definitely a question mark about why that money is not coming to the Scottish Government, given all of these funding pressures that we have,” she said.
She was asked if she believed the UK Government was “playing politics” with the plans but said there had been a “real difference” in the working relationship between both governments since Labour was elected to power, adding it was “far more open and collaborative”.
However, Robison (above) added: “What I would say about the Secretary of State for Scotland’s actions here is they are out of kilter with all of that.
“And that is disappointing because we should not see a continuation of the previous government’s bypassing of the Scottish Parliament.
READ MORE: Council tax could 'surge' in Scotland as Westminster cuts take toll
“It was unhelpful. It was inefficient as well, it didn’t lead to the best delivery of public finances to the right places.
“What he is suggesting here is out of kilter with a very positive relationship that we are building with the Treasury and other (UK) ministers.”
A source told the paper that Murray was “serious” about working constructively with the Scottish Government but “is also serious about getting things done”.
“His focus is on finding ways to directly improving people’s lives in practical ways and these new powers to turbocharge his office combined with a budget will allow him to do that,” they added.
“There has clearly been a degree of incompetence within the Scottish Government and this legislation will allow the Scotland Office to invest directly where it sees fit rather than getting bogged down in bureaucracy.”
“Of course it will be seen by some as a challenge to devolution and the UK Government rolling its tanks onto Holyrood’s lawn.
“But there are many voters who believe the SNP has squandered billions through rank incompetence and it is no bad thing for someone else to try and do a better job with a relatively small portion of public spending.”
A Westminster Government spokesman told the Sunday Mail: “The Scotland Office is at the heart of delivering the UK Government’s missions in Scotland, working with the Scottish Government to grow our economy, create jobs and reduce poverty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel