ANGUS Robertson has issued a statement as he faces calls from within the SNP to step down as External Affairs Secretary amid a row over a meeting with a top Israeli diplomat.
Robertson has faced stiff criticism after a meeting with Daniela Grudsky, Israel’s deputy ambassador to the UK, which was not publicised but came out after the diplomat posted about it on social media.
Thank you @AngusRobertson for welcoming us to wonderful Scotland.
— Daniela Grudsky (@DanielaGrudsky) August 12, 2024
Discussed the unique commonalities between 🇮🇱-🏴 and also emphasized the urgent need to bring back our 115 hostages.
Looking forward to cooperating in the fields of technology, culture and renewable energy. pic.twitter.com/sh2KeqRa9j
In his statement, Robertson contradicted reports that he had been asked to attend the controversial meeting by First Minister John Swinney, saying it had “rightly” been his own decision – although Swinney was aware of it.
He further apologised not for the meeting taking place, but for discussing topics other than Israel’s actions in Palestine and the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.
Robertson added that it had been decided that it “would not be appropriate to accept any invitation for a further meeting” with the Israeli government.
READ MORE: Kirsty Hughes: SNP sacrificed moral high ground on Gaza with indefensible Israeli diplomat meeting
In his statement, Robertson said: “Two weeks ago, I met the new Israeli UK deputy ambassador at their request.
“We anticipated the deputy ambassador would raise concerns about antisemitism, as well as other issues.
“It was rightly for me to decide whether to take the meeting, however, as is normal practice, the First Minister was made aware before the meeting happened.
“My view was that given the Israeli UK deputy ambassador had requested a meeting it was an opportunity to express the Scottish Government's clear and unwavering position on the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and I did exactly that.
“No one intended that this meeting be presented as legitimatising [sic] the actions of the Israeli government in Gaza. The Scottish Government has been consistent in our unequivocal condemnation of the atrocities we have witnessed in Gaza.
“The reality, however, is that this meeting has been taken by many to represent a normalisation of relations between the Israeli and Scottish Governments.
“As such, it is clear that it would have been better to ensure that the meeting was strictly limited to the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and an end to the appalling loss of life in the region. I apologise for the fact that this did not happen.
“Going forward, it is clear that, having now spoken direct [sic] to the Israeli Government and making them aware of our position on an immediate ceasefire, it would not be appropriate to accept any invitation for a further meeting.
READ MORE: Labour panned for plan to bypass Holyrood with new Scotland Office powers
“This will remain our position until such time as real progress has been made towards peace, unimpeded access to humanitarian assistance is provided and Israel cooperates fully with its international obligations on the investigation of genocide and war crimes.
“The Scottish Government does not support any normalisation of its relations with the Israeli Government during this period.
“The Scottish Government will never hold back in expressing support for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages, an end to UK arms being sent to Israel, and the recognition of a sovereign Palestinian state within a two-state solution.”
The row over the meeting has seen John Mason, the MSP for Glasgow Shettleston, lose the SNP whip after arguing that Israel is not committing genocide in Gaza.
The comments, which he has refused to retract, came after the MSP revealed that he had also met with Israeli diplomat Grudsky.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel