THE Scottish Government must take on unregulated bus companies if it wants to get more people using public transport, a leading campaigner has said after a major rail discount scheme was scrapped.
Ministers have axed a pilot which temporarily got rid of peak rail fares after it failed to sufficiently boost passenger numbers to pay for itself.
But Ellie Harrison (below), the founder of the public transport campaign Get Glasgow Moving, has argued the root cause of people not using public transport was the bus system.
She pointed to research which showed that bus use across England had declined since services were deregulated in the 1980s, except for in London where buses remained regulated.
An integrated model, something which is being considered by the Scottish Government, would allow passengers to use one card or ticket across buses and trains and would also boost passenger confidence to get more people out of cars, said Harrison.
She went on: “We want it to be easier to be used across all different modes and for all the modes to be planned and co-ordinated so that they work together.
READ MORE: ScotRail fares set for price hike as discount scheme scrapped
“The way that you do that is by planning the timetables to co-ordinate and planning the routes to connect seamlessly, with integrated ticketing.”
A London-style system, where passengers were able to tap on and off buses and trains with just a bank card with a daily price cap would mean passengers “know that there’s a public authority who’s responsible for delivering the ticketing scheme to make sure you get the best value”, according to Harrison.
A lack of regulation had also led to inflated fares in Scotland’s largest city, Harrison added.
She said: “There’s no regulation over bus fares at the moment and that’s why they’re so expensive. It is actually already cheaper in Glasgow to get the train from most places, if you’re lucky enough to live near a train station or a subway station than it is to get the bus.”
More people would use public transport if “it’s cheaper, more reliable, and if it takes them where they need to go”, said Harrison, who pointed to Glasgow’s “underutilised” suburban rail network which was not integrated with the local bus service.
READ MORE: ScotRail fares are set to increase – here's how it will affect you
She said: “Not everyone’s got a train station next to them, whereas we could live in a world where everybody had a bus route within however many metres from their front door, that is possible, it’s within our grasp, it happens in other countries but it takes the regulation of the bus network so that it’s actually planned around people’s needs rather than at the whim of private bus companies as it is at the moment.”
Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop (above) announced the end of the rail fares discount scheme, saying it had failed in efforts to get enough extra passengers on trains.
Peak fares will be brought back on September 27 after passenger numbers were boosted by 6.8% by the scheme. They would have had to have increased by 10% for the changes to be self-financing.
Hyslop pointed to budgetary pressures which meant “this level of subsidy cannot continue in the current financial climate”.
The Scottish Greens said that “behavioural change doesn’t happen overnight” and said the change should have been made permanent to boost passenger numbers further.
Get Glasgow Moving last week launched a petition calling on Transport Scotland to allow bodies like the Strathclyde Partnership for Transport to use powers they could have under existing legislation to improve bus services.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel