FORMER Better Together chief Blair McDougall has been mocked over “indifference” towards his anti-independence newsletter after he was forced to reveal the number of paying readers.
McDougall has revealed the paying readership of his Notes on Nationalism newsletter after he published his first list of financial interests on becoming the new Labour MP for East Renfrewshire.
In the register, he wrote the newsletter only has “around 50” paying subscribers.
McDougall, who also recorded consultancy fees totalling £11,400 for events in America and Georgia, did not provide a figure for how much in total his newsletter brought in.
Subscribers can sign up for free to Notes on Nationalism, which has been handed over to writer and political consultant Andrew Liddle.
READ MORE: 'Major surge' in deportations of asylum seekers announced by Labour
But those who pay – with prices starting at £5.33 per month – get access to exclusive stories and the full archive of posts as well as the ability to post comments and “join the community”.
In the “about” section of the newsletter’s website, McDougall noted his experience running the anti-independence Better Together campaign in 2014 and how “people often get in touch with me for campaign analysis or for advice on how to overcome the instincts that drive people to support such populist causes”.
He added: “I thought it might be of interest to someone if I started writing some of that down and shared it more widely.”
But SNP MP Pete Wishart (above) said the paying subscriber figures showed “no one cares”. He told The National: “Notes on total and utter indifference. No one's interested and no one cares. Just like the positive case for the Union.”
READ MORE: Rachel Reeves 'considering spending cuts and tax hikes as growth fails to deliver'
The East Renfrewshire MP also listed donations from Labour megadonor Francesca Perrin, who gifted him a total for £16,000 before the election. He also received £2900 from London-based public relations firm 89Up, which specialises in communications for “civil society and non-profits”.
McDougall was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel