A SENIOR Labour minister has responded to the Scottish Government's decision to suspend future meetings with Israeli officials.
The decision came after criticism faced by Scottish External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson, who apologised after he met Israel’s deputy ambassador to the UK Daniela Grudsky on August 8 to discuss issues such as energy and culture.
The Scottish Government then suspended meetings with Israel, with Robertson (below) saying while he communicated the need for a ceasefire the discussion of other issues was “not appropriate”.
However, the UK Government announced last month that it had reopened trade negotiations with Israel.
But amid Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza and calls to divest and halt arms sales to Israel, the move has been condemned by campaigners as “rewarding Israel for war crimes”.
Speaking to the PA news agency during a visit to Glengoyne distillery in Scotland (below), Trade and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said it is for the Scottish Government to decide whether meetings with Israeli officials are appropriate.
However, he also added: “I think it is still important to recognise as a UK Government that we want an immediate ceasefire.
“But of course, you’ve still got to be engaged with all partners within that very difficult conflict we still have.
“I, for instance, have spoken to my counterpart the Israeli trade minister because we’ve inherited a process in terms of improving the trade relationship that we have with Israel. I think it’s still important to recognise that.
"It’s a difficult part of the world but we’ve got to be engaged and of course there are issues there around the threat that Iran poses that we have to recognise, and we’ve got to be part of that discussion.”
READ MORE: Read Angus Robertson's full statement on SNP minister's Israel meeting
Asked if he expressed the need for a ceasefire at these meetings, he said: “We do that as a Government in all avenues.”
Reynolds then appeared to suggest that Israel’s brutal actions during the war on Gaza and its impact on civilians isn’t “specifically” discussed at UK trade meetings.
“Of course, when I am doing the trade issues the meetings tend to be focused specifically on that, but we have across the whole of the Government made clear that we want to see an immediate end to that conflict and an end to the human suffering,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel