LABOUR are haemorrhaging members with the ranks of the party faithful contracting by almost 10% in a year, according to the latest figures.
According to the party’s accounts published by the Electoral Commission, Labour lost 37,005 members between 2022 and last year.
That brings them down to 370,450 members, down 9% and way down on its Jeremy Corbyn-era peak in 2019 when membership hit more than 532,000.
READ MORE: SNP membership numbers fall but accounts see turnaround with over £600,000 surplus
But income from the membership has increased, up from nearly £16 million to just short of £17m.
Donations also rocketed in the year before the General Election, with the party embarking on a major charm offensive of deep-pocketed donors, including City fat cats and business tycoons.
The party was gifted £10.5m in 2022, rising to £16.5m last year. In total the party’s income rose from £47m to £58.6m in the year before the election.
The party posted a deficit of £851,000 last year, having recorded a budget surplus of £2.7m the year before.
The treasurers’ report, signed off by Labour’s general secretary David Evans and party treasurer Mike Payne, noted the deficit was better than expected because of “an increase in high value donations when compared to the previous year and delivery of a successful Labour Party conference, which had a significant increase in delegate attendance and delivered income above planned”.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar called out over 'misleading' claim on Scotch whisky announcement
They attributed far higher outgoings in 2023 – total expenditure was up from £44m to £59m – to a hiring drive, a head office move and more money going spent on technology and regional teams to get the party in a “a state of readiness for a General Election”.
The report also noted that Labour’s election victory changed their financial situation “significantly”, adding: “The impact of potential changes in income and a need to manage expenditure will become even more critical.
“The party’s financial accountability and resource control will need to be robust and embedded across the organisation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel